Alexithymia Test – Am I Alexithymic?

Research Dataset

Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
STRONG N=449 α=0.917 24Countries

Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS) normative dataset currently contains 449 participant records collected between Jun 11, 2026 and Oct 24, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 449 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 57.67 with a standard deviation of 18.06, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.917). Observed skewness (-0.3) and kurtosis (-0.2) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

449
Participants
24
Countries
21
Scale Items
0.917
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS)
Research Status Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity 80 /100 — STRONG
Participants 449
Countries Represented 24
Items 21
Dimensions 7
Data Collection Period Jun 11, 2026 – Oct 24, 2026
Reliability α = 0.917
Note. The current Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS) dataset contains 449 participant records collected from 24 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.

Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 57.67%
Median Score 59
Standard Deviation 18.06
Variance 326.28
Standard Error 0.85
95% CI Lower 56
95% CI Upper 59.34
Minimum Score 5%
Maximum Score 94%
Observed Range 89
Note. M = 57.67, SD = 18.06, Median = 59. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 56 to 59.34.

Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 449
Countries 24
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.

Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 24 countries. The largest contribution originated from BR (28.5% of available geographic records).

Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 37% Very Low
25th 44% Below Average
50th 59% Average
75th 72% Above Average
90th 80% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS) sample.

Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 5% to 94% (M = 57.67, SD = 18.06). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.3) and kurtosis (-0.2). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.

Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.917
Reliability Classification Excellent
Participants 449
Items 21
Standard Error 0.85
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.

Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q6 0.74 Excellent Q2 0.7 Excellent Q3 0.7 Excellent Q17 0.69 Excellent Q13 0.66 Excellent Q4 0.66 Excellent Q9 0.65 Excellent Q16 0.64 Excellent Q5 0.63 Excellent Q1 0.62 Excellent Q20 0.62 Excellent Q15 0.61 Excellent Q18 0.58 Excellent Q14 0.57 Excellent Q19 0.55 Excellent Q12 0.54 Excellent Q8 0.5 Excellent Q7 0.4 Acceptable Q11 0.4 Acceptable Q10 0.37 Acceptable Q21 -0.12 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified1 itemthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q21 (r = -0.12)
    I find it challenging to describe subtle emotional experiences.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q21 ("I find it challenging to describe subtle emotional experiences."; r = -0.12), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.

Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Externalization 73.43% 21.22 449
Expression 66.56% 25.17 449
Identification 64.05% 23.01 449
Experience 52.28% 26.78 449
Awareness 52.13% 26.7 449
Imagination 48.13% 24.87 449
Vocabulary 47.97% 20.16 449
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS).

Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Externalization (73.4%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Vocabulary (48%). The observed difference between dimensions was 25.5 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.

Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 449
Countries 24
Collection Start Jun 11, 2026
Collection End Oct 24, 2026
Months Recorded 5
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 449 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 449 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.


Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.


Recommended Citation

Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/deez-alexithymia-scale/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset


PDF