Alexithymia Test – Am I Alexithymic?

Research Dataset

Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
STRONG N=291 α=0.911 19Countries

Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS) normative dataset currently contains 291 participant records collected between Jun 11, 2026 and Aug 11, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 291 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 55.92 with a standard deviation of 17.63, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.911). Observed skewness (0.03) and kurtosis (-0.33) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

291
Participants
19
Countries
21
Scale Items
0.911
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS)
Research Status Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity 75 /100 — STRONG
Participants 291
Countries Represented 19
Items 21
Dimensions 7
Data Collection Period Jun 11, 2026 – Aug 11, 2026
Reliability α = 0.911
Note. The current Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS) dataset contains 291 participant records collected from 19 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.

Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 55.92%
Median Score 53
Standard Deviation 17.63
Variance 310.7
Standard Error 1.03
95% CI Lower 53.9
95% CI Upper 57.95
Minimum Score 7%
Maximum Score 92%
Observed Range 85
Note. M = 55.92, SD = 17.63, Median = 53. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 53.9 to 57.95.

Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 291
Countries 19
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.

Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 19 countries. The largest contribution originated from DE (36.1% of available geographic records).

Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 37% Very Low
25th 44% Below Average
50th 53% Average
75th 69% Above Average
90th 80% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS) sample.

Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 7% to 92% (M = 55.92, SD = 17.63). Distribution characteristics included skewness (0.03) and kurtosis (-0.33). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.

Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.911
Reliability Classification Excellent
Participants 291
Items 21
Standard Error 1.03
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.

Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q6 0.75 Excellent Q17 0.73 Excellent Q2 0.68 Excellent Q3 0.67 Excellent Q13 0.66 Excellent Q15 0.65 Excellent Q4 0.64 Excellent Q20 0.63 Excellent Q1 0.62 Excellent Q9 0.61 Excellent Q16 0.6 Excellent Q14 0.59 Excellent Q5 0.59 Excellent Q12 0.58 Excellent Q18 0.54 Excellent Q19 0.52 Excellent Q8 0.49 Acceptable Q11 0.38 Acceptable Q7 0.36 Acceptable Q10 0.26 Weak Q21 -0.11 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified2 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q10 (r = 0.26)
    When I try to imagine a future scenario, my mind goes blank.
  • Q21 (r = -0.11)
    I find it challenging to describe subtle emotional experiences.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q21 ("I find it challenging to describe subtle emotional experiences."; r = -0.11), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.

Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Externalization 72.07% 20.09 291
Expression 64.56% 24.83 291
Identification 62.64% 22.34 291
Awareness 50.01% 26.42 291
Experience 48.46% 26.57 291
Vocabulary 47.87% 21.98 291
Imagination 47.32% 23.77 291
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS).

Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Externalization (72.1%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Imagination (47.3%). The observed difference between dimensions was 24.8 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.

Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 291
Countries 19
Collection Start Jun 11, 2026
Collection End Aug 11, 2026
Months Recorded 3
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 291 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 291 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.


Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.


Recommended Citation

Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/deez-alexithymia-scale/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset


PDF