Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS)
normative dataset currently contains
228
participant records collected between
Jun 11, 2026
and
Jul 17, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 228 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 54.95 with a standard deviation of 17.2, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.905). Observed skewness (0.31) and kurtosis (-0.32) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
228
Participants
17
Countries
21
Scale Items
0.905
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS)
Research Status
Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity
65
/100 —
STRONG
Participants
228
Countries Represented
17
Items
21
Dimensions
7
Data Collection Period
Jun 11, 2026
–
Jul 17, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.905
Note.
The current Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS) dataset contains 228 participant records collected from 17 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
54.95%
Median Score
50
Standard Deviation
17.2
Variance
295.73
Standard Error
1.14
95% CI Lower
52.72
95% CI Upper
57.18
Minimum Score
7%
Maximum Score
91%
Observed Range
84
Note.
M = 54.95, SD = 17.2, Median = 50. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 52.72 to 57.18.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
228
Countries
17
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
25-34
18
35-44
16
18-24
15
under18
15
55plus
12
prefer_not
8
45-54
4
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Female
49
Male
32
Prefer_not
7
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 17 countries. The largest contribution originated from DE (39.9% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
DE
91
39.9%
BR
51
22.4%
US
18
7.9%
PT
17
7.5%
GB
13
5.7%
FR
11
4.8%
IN
8
3.5%
CA
4
1.8%
MX
4
1.8%
CN
2
0.9%
GQ
2
0.9%
BE
2
0.9%
NL
1
0.4%
AR
1
0.4%
CH
1
0.4%
KR
1
0.4%
AT
1
0.4%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
40%
Very Low
25th
44%
Below Average
50th
50%
Average
75th
67%
Above Average
90th
80%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 7% to 91% (M = 54.95, SD = 17.2). Distribution characteristics included skewness (0.31) and kurtosis (-0.32).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.905
Reliability Classification
Excellent
Participants
228
Items
21
Standard Error
1.14
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
The analysis identified3
itemsthat may benefit from future review.
Items Recommended for Future Review
Q7
(r = 0.29)
I'm more interested in solving problems than discussing emotions.
Q10
(r = 0.26)
When I try to imagine a future scenario, my mind goes blank.
Q21
(r = -0.11)
I find it challenging to describe subtle emotional experiences.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q21 ("I find it challenging to describe subtle emotional experiences."; r = -0.11), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Externalization
71.18%
19.6
228
Expression
62.69%
23.93
228
Identification
62.28%
21.25
228
Awareness
48.93%
26.03
228
Imagination
47.72%
23.99
228
Vocabulary
47.5%
23.41
228
Experience
46.15%
26.03
228
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Externalization (71.2%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Experience (46.2%). The observed difference between dimensions was 25 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
228
Countries
17
Collection Start
Jun 11, 2026
Collection End
Jul 17, 2026
Months Recorded
2
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
228
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
228
valid response records.
Approximately
0
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/deez-alexithymia-scale/statistics/