Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS)
normative dataset currently contains
358
participant records collected between
Jun 11, 2026
and
Sep 8, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 358 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 57.43 with a standard deviation of 17.49, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.91). Observed skewness (-0.18) and kurtosis (-0.22) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
358
Participants
22
Countries
21
Scale Items
0.91
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS)
Research Status
Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity
80
/100 —
STRONG
Participants
358
Countries Represented
22
Items
21
Dimensions
7
Data Collection Period
Jun 11, 2026
–
Sep 8, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.91
Note.
The current Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS) dataset contains 358 participant records collected from 22 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
57.43%
Median Score
57
Standard Deviation
17.49
Variance
305.95
Standard Error
0.92
95% CI Lower
55.62
95% CI Upper
59.24
Minimum Score
6%
Maximum Score
92%
Observed Range
86
Note.
M = 57.43, SD = 17.49, Median = 57. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 55.62 to 59.24.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
358
Countries
22
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
18-24
50
25-34
48
under18
41
35-44
34
55plus
22
45-54
12
prefer_not
11
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Female
131
Male
72
Prefer_not
15
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 22 countries. The largest contribution originated from DE (31% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
DE
111
31%
BR
102
28.5%
FR
37
10.3%
US
30
8.4%
PT
21
5.9%
GB
15
4.2%
IN
9
2.5%
CA
7
2%
MX
4
1.1%
BE
3
0.8%
NL
3
0.8%
CH
2
0.6%
PL
2
0.6%
CN
2
0.6%
SE
2
0.6%
GQ
2
0.6%
BO
1
0.3%
KR
1
0.3%
ES
1
0.3%
AT
1
0.3%
AR
1
0.3%
PH
1
0.3%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
40%
Very Low
25th
44%
Below Average
50th
57%
Average
75th
72%
Above Average
90th
80%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 6% to 92% (M = 57.43, SD = 17.49). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.18) and kurtosis (-0.22).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.91
Reliability Classification
Excellent
Participants
358
Items
21
Standard Error
0.92
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
The analysis identified2
itemsthat may benefit from future review.
Items Recommended for Future Review
Q10
(r = 0.29)
When I try to imagine a future scenario, my mind goes blank.
Q21
(r = -0.13)
I find it challenging to describe subtle emotional experiences.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q21 ("I find it challenging to describe subtle emotional experiences."; r = -0.13), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Externalization
73.26%
20.81
358
Expression
66.71%
24.53
358
Identification
64.34%
22.53
358
Awareness
51.61%
26.37
358
Experience
50.7%
26.41
358
Imagination
48.37%
24.01
358
Vocabulary
48.21%
20.77
358
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Externalization (73.3%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Vocabulary (48.2%). The observed difference between dimensions was 25.1 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
358
Countries
22
Collection Start
Jun 11, 2026
Collection End
Sep 8, 2026
Months Recorded
4
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
358
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
358
valid response records.
Approximately
0
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/deez-alexithymia-scale/statistics/