Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS)
normative dataset currently contains
202
participant records collected between
Jun 11, 2026
and
Jul 11, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 202 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 54.36 with a standard deviation of 15.8, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.88). Observed skewness (0.54) and kurtosis (-0.36) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
202
Participants
16
Countries
21
Scale Items
0.88
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS)
Research Status
Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity
60
/100 —
DEVELOPING
Participants
202
Countries Represented
16
Items
21
Dimensions
7
Data Collection Period
Jun 11, 2026
–
Jul 11, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.88
Note.
The current Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS) dataset contains 202 participant records collected from 16 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
54.36%
Median Score
48
Standard Deviation
15.8
Variance
249.63
Standard Error
1.11
95% CI Lower
52.18
95% CI Upper
56.54
Minimum Score
15%
Maximum Score
91%
Observed Range
76
Note.
M = 54.36, SD = 15.8, Median = 48. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 52.18 to 56.54.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
202
Countries
16
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
25-34
13
18-24
12
35-44
10
under18
9
prefer_not
8
55plus
8
45-54
2
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Female
34
Male
21
Prefer_not
7
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 16 countries. The largest contribution originated from DE (43.6% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
DE
88
43.6%
BR
42
20.8%
US
18
8.9%
PT
16
7.9%
FR
9
4.5%
IN
8
4%
GB
6
3%
MX
4
2%
BE
2
1%
CN
2
1%
GQ
2
1%
CH
1
0.5%
KR
1
0.5%
AT
1
0.5%
NL
1
0.5%
AR
1
0.5%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
40%
Very Low
25th
44%
Below Average
50th
48%
Average
75th
63%
Above Average
90th
78%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 15% to 91% (M = 54.36, SD = 15.8). Distribution characteristics included skewness (0.54) and kurtosis (-0.36).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.88
Reliability Classification
Good
Participants
202
Items
21
Standard Error
1.11
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
The analysis identified3
itemsthat may benefit from future review.
Items Recommended for Future Review
Q7
(r = 0.22)
I'm more interested in solving problems than discussing emotions.
Q10
(r = 0.17)
When I try to imagine a future scenario, my mind goes blank.
Q21
(r = -0.1)
I find it challenging to describe subtle emotional experiences.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q21 ("I find it challenging to describe subtle emotional experiences."; r = -0.10), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Externalization
70.63%
19.08
202
Expression
62.52%
22.34
202
Identification
61.63%
19.9
202
Awareness
48.31%
25.1
202
Vocabulary
47.6%
23.78
202
Imagination
47.45%
22.82
202
Experience
44.42%
24.56
202
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Externalization (70.6%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Experience (44.4%). The observed difference between dimensions was 26.2 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
202
Countries
16
Collection Start
Jun 11, 2026
Collection End
Jul 11, 2026
Months Recorded
2
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
202
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
202
valid response records.
Approximately
0
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Deenz Alexithymia Scale (DAS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/deez-alexithymia-scale/statistics/