Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Inferiority Complex Test

Research Dataset

Deenz Inferiority Complex Scale (DICS)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
PRELIMINARY N=4 α=0 2Countries
Abstract

Deenz Inferiority Complex Scale (DICS) normative dataset currently contains 4 participant records collected between Jul 16, 2026 and Jul 18, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 4 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 78 with a standard deviation of 11.75, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis produced a Cronbach alpha of 0, which falls below commonly accepted psychometric standards and should be interpreted cautiously until additional data are collected. Observed skewness (-0.33) and kurtosis (-2.62) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

4
Participants
2
Countries
21
Scale Items
0
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Inferiority Complex Scale (DICS)
Research Status Preliminary Dataset
Dataset Maturity 5 /100 — PRELIMINARY
Participants 4
Countries Represented 2
Items 21
Dimensions 4
Data Collection Period Jul 16, 2026 – Jul 18, 2026
Reliability α = 0
Note. The current Deenz Inferiority Complex Scale (DICS) dataset contains 4 participant records collected from 2 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 78%
Median Score 79
Standard Deviation 11.75
Variance 138
Standard Error 5.87
95% CI Lower 66.49
95% CI Upper 89.51
Minimum Score 64%
Maximum Score 90%
Observed Range 26
Note. M = 78, SD = 11.75, Median = 79. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 66.49 to 89.51.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 4
Countries 2
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 2 countries. The largest contribution originated from IN (75% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 64% Very Low
25th 64% Below Average
50th 73% Average
75th 85% Above Average
90th 85% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Inferiority Complex Scale (DICS) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 64% to 90% (M = 78, SD = 11.75). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.33) and kurtosis (-2.62). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0
Reliability Classification Unacceptable
Participants 4
Items 21
Standard Error 5.87
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Insufficient Sample Size

Item–total correlations are not currently reported because the assessment has fewer than 100 participant responses. Psychometric item analysis requires a larger sample to produce stable and interpretable estimates.

Current Participants: 4
Minimum Recommended: 100
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Social Comparison 87% 12.62 4
Performance Doubt 87% 13.22 4
Evaluation Anxiety 63.75% 8.54 4
Self-Doubt 63.75% 14.36 4
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Inferiority Complex Scale (DICS).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Social Comparison (87%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Evaluation Anxiety (63.8%). The observed difference between dimensions was 23.3 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 4
Countries 2
Collection Start Jul 16, 2026
Collection End Jul 18, 2026
Months Recorded 1
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 4 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 4 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Deenz Inferiority Complex Scale (DICS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/inferiority-complex-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset