Ψ Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool
☰
🏠 Main Page 📝 Questionnaire
Research Dataset

Deenz Impostor Phenomenon Scale (DIPS)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
PRELIMINARY N=2 α=0 1Countries
Abstract

Deenz Impostor Phenomenon Scale (DIPS) normative dataset currently contains 2 participant records collected between Jun 28, 2026 and Jun 28, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 2 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 54 with a standard deviation of 0, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis produced a Cronbach alpha of 0, which falls below commonly accepted psychometric standards and should be interpreted cautiously until additional data are collected. Observed skewness (0) and kurtosis (0) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

2
Participants
1
Countries
48
Items
0
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Impostor Phenomenon Scale (DIPS)
Research Status Preliminary Dataset
Dataset Maturity 0 /100 — PRELIMINARY
Participants 2
Countries Represented 1
Items 48
Dimensions 12
Data Collection Period Jun 28, 2026 – Jun 28, 2026
Reliability α = 0
Note. The current Deenz Impostor Phenomenon Scale (DIPS) dataset contains 2 participant records collected from 1 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 54%
Median Score 54
Standard Deviation 0
Variance 0
Standard Error 0
95% CI Lower 54
95% CI Upper 54
Minimum Score 54%
Maximum Score 54%
Observed Range 0
Note. M = 54, SD = 0, Median = 54. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 54 to 54.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 2
Countries 1
Age Information Not Available
Gender Information Not Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 1 countries. The largest contribution originated from IN (100% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 54% Very Low
25th 54% Below Average
50th 54% Average
75th 54% Above Average
90th 54% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Impostor Phenomenon Scale (DIPS) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 54% to 54% (M = 54, SD = 0). Distribution characteristics included skewness (0) and kurtosis (0). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0
Reliability Classification Unacceptable
Participants 2
Items 48
Standard Error 0
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Insufficient Sample Size

Item–total correlations are not currently reported because the assessment has fewer than 100 participant responses. Psychometric item analysis requires a larger sample to produce stable and interpretable estimates.

Current Participants: 2
Minimum Recommended: 100
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Competence 75% 0 2
Risk Taking 75% 0 2
Self-Confidence 63% 0 2
Praise Acceptance 63% 0 2
Self-Worth 56% 0 2
Overworking 56% 0 2
Success Attribution 50% 0 2
Help Seeking 50% 0 2
Self-Doubt 44% 0 2
Fear of Being Exposed 44% 0 2
Social Comparison 38% 0 2
Perfectionism 38% 0 2
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Impostor Phenomenon Scale (DIPS).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Competence (75%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Social Comparison (38%). The observed difference between dimensions was 37 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 2
Countries 1
Collection Start Jun 28, 2026
Collection End Jun 28, 2026
Months Recorded 1
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 2 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 2 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Deenz Impostor Phenomenon Scale (DIPS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/imposter-syndrome-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset