Dark Triad Test – Dark Triad Personality Scale

Dark triad personality test is also available in the following languages:

ENPTDERU

Basic information

Statements:33
Duration:4–6 minutes
Type:Self-assessment Quiz
Publishing year:2023
Seminal paper:Deen Mohd Dar. Deenz Dark Triad Personality Scale: Development, Validation, and Reliability, 14 November 2023, PREPRINT (Version 2) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3565477/v2]

This self-assessment quiz is based on the preliminary version of the research paper – Development and Validation of Deenz Dark Triad Personality Scale (DTPS-33©). Participation in this quiz is completely anonymous, we do not collect any personal information and we do not store your results for research purposes.

The Dark Triad is a psychological theory or concept aimed at understanding and studying the dark side of individuals’ personalities. It encompasses overlapping yet distinct personality traits, including Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism.

Back in 2002, two psychologists Delroy L. Paulhus and Kevin M. Williams worked together on a research paper titled “The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy.” and coined the term “Dark Triad” trio of negative personality traits [1] Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563. . In this research paper, they described three different but related personality traits that are considered socially undesirable. The research resulted in the development of dark triad scales which helps in measuring inclination towards these socially undesirable traits.

What are the 3 Dark Triads?

Delroy L. Paulhus and Kevin M. Williams In their research, they proposed that every individual has a dark side of their personality and it needs thorough evaluation to determine the extent to which these traits may be dominant.

Machiavellianism: Machiavellianism is a famous word in psychology named after a 16th-century political philosopher Niccolò Machiavelli, famous for his book “the prince”. The main message in the book is that leaders can use Manipulate, Deceit, and explicit behavior to strive for power and position and it is the necessity to maintain the power and accomplish that goals. [2] Jones, D. (2020). Machiavellianism.

Narcissism: Narcissism is a personal trait in which an individual has an extreme sense of self-importance and a constant urge for administration resulting in ignoring the needs of others and a lack of empathy. The good example may be a person who feels uncomfortable in the situations where he/she is not the center of attention and who is always talking about the prestige or status. Take the narcissistic personality disorder test. [3] Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Hyatt, C. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2017). Controversies in Narcissism.

Psychopathy: Psychopathy is described as having a lack of remorse, being callous and cynical. Psychopathy exists on a spectrum and not everyone with psychopathic traits meets the diagnostic criteria for antisocial personality disorder. You may also like to take the psychopathy spectrum scale. [4] De Brito…… (2021). Psychopathy. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 7(1), 1-21.

References

  1. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6

  2. Jones, D. (2020). Machiavellianism. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1245

  3. Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Hyatt, C. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2017). Controversies in Narcissism. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045244

  4. De Brito, S. A., Forth, A. E., R., A., Brazil, I. A., Kimonis, E. R., Pardini, D., Frick, P. J., Blair, R. J., & Viding, E. (2021). Psychopathy. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 7(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-021-00282-1

Advertisement