Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Childhood Trauma Test - Adverse Childhood Experience Quiz

Research Dataset

Developmental Trauma Profile (DTP)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
STRONG N=117 α=0.982 20Countries
Abstract

Developmental Trauma Profile (DTP) normative dataset currently contains 117 participant records collected between Jun 27, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 117 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 38.6 with a standard deviation of 18.97, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.982). Observed skewness (-0.81) and kurtosis (-0.3) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

117
Participants
20
Countries
90
Scale Items
0.982
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Developmental Trauma Profile (DTP)
Research Status Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity 70 /100 — STRONG
Participants 117
Countries Represented 20
Items 90
Dimensions 18
Data Collection Period Jun 27, 2026 – Oct 9, 2026
Reliability α = 0.982
Note. The current Developmental Trauma Profile (DTP) dataset contains 117 participant records collected from 20 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 38.6%
Median Score 42
Standard Deviation 18.97
Variance 360
Standard Error 1.75
95% CI Lower 35.16
95% CI Upper 42.04
Minimum Score 0%
Maximum Score 68%
Observed Range 68
Note. M = 38.6, SD = 18.97, Median = 42. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 35.16 to 42.04.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 117
Countries 20
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 20 countries. The largest contribution originated from IN (28.2% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 0% Very Low
25th 33% Below Average
50th 42% Average
75th 53% Above Average
90th 58% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Developmental Trauma Profile (DTP) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 0% to 68% (M = 38.6, SD = 18.97). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.81) and kurtosis (-0.3). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.982
Reliability Classification Excellent
Participants 117
Items 90
Standard Error 1.75
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q101 0.8 Excellent Q92 0.78 Excellent Q96 0.78 Excellent Q88 0.78 Excellent Q91 0.77 Excellent Q93 0.77 Excellent Q102 0.77 Excellent Q116 0.76 Excellent Q110 0.76 Excellent Q103 0.75 Excellent Q86 0.75 Excellent Q107 0.75 Excellent Q83 0.75 Excellent Q117 0.75 Excellent Q115 0.75 Excellent Q105 0.74 Excellent Q111 0.74 Excellent Q108 0.74 Excellent Q85 0.74 Excellent Q76 0.74 Excellent Q80 0.72 Excellent Q122 0.72 Excellent Q106 0.71 Excellent Q97 0.71 Excellent Q118 0.71 Excellent Q120 0.71 Excellent Q81 0.71 Excellent Q78 0.7 Excellent Q90 0.7 Excellent Q77 0.7 Excellent Q112 0.7 Excellent Q123 0.69 Excellent Q82 0.69 Excellent Q104 0.69 Excellent Q87 0.67 Excellent Q98 0.66 Excellent Q57 0.65 Excellent Q95 0.64 Excellent Q58 0.63 Excellent Q121 0.63 Excellent Q66 0.63 Excellent Q127 0.63 Excellent Q56 0.63 Excellent Q125 0.62 Excellent Q129 0.61 Excellent Q65 0.61 Excellent Q71 0.61 Excellent Q113 0.61 Excellent Q68 0.61 Excellent Q75 0.6 Excellent Q126 0.6 Excellent Q67 0.59 Excellent Q62 0.59 Excellent Q70 0.59 Excellent Q72 0.58 Excellent Q73 0.57 Excellent Q128 0.57 Excellent Q61 0.57 Excellent Q63 0.57 Excellent Q135 0.57 Excellent Q138 0.55 Excellent Q60 0.55 Excellent Q133 0.54 Excellent Q142 0.54 Excellent Q140 0.54 Excellent Q132 0.53 Excellent Q74 0.53 Excellent Q69 0.53 Excellent Q131 0.53 Excellent Q55 0.53 Excellent Q141 0.52 Excellent Q130 0.51 Excellent Q59 0.51 Excellent Q119 0.51 Excellent Q143 0.51 Excellent Q114 0.5 Acceptable Q136 0.49 Acceptable Q64 0.49 Acceptable Q137 0.48 Acceptable Q109 0.45 Acceptable Q124 0.43 Acceptable Q79 0.43 Acceptable Q100 0.42 Acceptable Q139 0.4 Acceptable Q94 0.38 Acceptable Q99 0.37 Acceptable Q89 0.31 Acceptable Q84 0.24 Weak Q134 0.21 Weak Q144 0.04 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified3 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q84 (r = 0.24)
    I found it easy to say no.
  • Q134 (r = 0.21)
    I rarely reflect on my life.
  • Q144 (r = 0.04)
    I give up easily.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q144 ("I give up easily."; r = 0.04), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Self-Worth 56.58% 33.73 115
Emotional Suppression 53.49% 35 115
Perfectionism 53.42% 35.01 115
Trust in Others 52.52% 33.12 115
Emotional Regulation 50.44% 33.09 115
Boundaries 48% 30.06 115
Positive Childhood Experiences 47.7% 31.87 115
Supportive Relationships 46.91% 31.77 115
Emotional Availability 46.02% 36.55 117
People Pleasing 42.66% 31.81 115
Hypervigilance 42.07% 31.73 117
Self-Awareness 40.25% 32.81 115
Sense of Belonging 36.91% 29.31 117
Recovery 36.65% 29.67 115
Resilience 34.7% 27.42 115
Consistency 34.11% 25.14 117
Trust & Security 34.03% 26.46 117
Childhood Experiences 31.55% 23.38 117
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Developmental Trauma Profile (DTP).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Self-Worth (56.6%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Childhood Experiences (31.6%). The observed difference between dimensions was 25 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 117
Countries 20
Collection Start Jun 27, 2026
Collection End Oct 9, 2026
Months Recorded 5
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 117 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 117 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Developmental Trauma Profile (DTP). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/childhood-trauma-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset