Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Neurodivergent Test – Am I Neurodivergent

Research Dataset

Deenz Neurodiversity Scale (DNS)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
ROBUST N=2159 α=0.853 62Countries
Abstract

Deenz Neurodiversity Scale (DNS) normative dataset currently contains 2159 participant records collected between Jun 9, 2026 and Aug 2, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 2159 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 55.02 with a standard deviation of 12.77, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.853). Observed skewness (-0.32) and kurtosis (0.19) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

2159
Participants
62
Countries
32
Scale Items
0.853
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Neurodiversity Scale (DNS)
Research Status Robust Dataset
Dataset Maturity 95 /100 — ROBUST
Participants 2159
Countries Represented 62
Items 32
Dimensions 4
Data Collection Period Jun 9, 2026 – Aug 2, 2026
Reliability α = 0.853
Note. The current Deenz Neurodiversity Scale (DNS) dataset contains 2159 participant records collected from 62 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 55.02%
Median Score 55
Standard Deviation 12.77
Variance 163.14
Standard Error 0.27
95% CI Lower 54.48
95% CI Upper 55.56
Minimum Score 7%
Maximum Score 89%
Observed Range 82
Note. M = 55.02, SD = 12.77, Median = 55. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 54.48 to 55.56.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 2159
Countries 62
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 62 countries. The largest contribution originated from DE (40.8% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 39% Very Low
25th 47% Below Average
50th 55% Average
75th 64% Above Average
90th 70% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Neurodiversity Scale (DNS) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 7% to 89% (M = 55.02, SD = 12.77). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.32) and kurtosis (0.19). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.853
Reliability Classification Good
Participants 2159
Items 32
Standard Error 0.27
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q14 0.57 Excellent Q7 0.52 Excellent Q12 0.52 Excellent Q13 0.51 Excellent Q29 0.5 Acceptable Q9 0.46 Acceptable Q28 0.44 Acceptable Q6 0.43 Acceptable Q18 0.43 Acceptable Q30 0.41 Acceptable Q1 0.4 Acceptable Q17 0.4 Acceptable Q3 0.39 Acceptable Q11 0.39 Acceptable Q16 0.38 Acceptable Q25 0.38 Acceptable Q27 0.36 Acceptable Q2 0.35 Acceptable Q8 0.34 Acceptable Q10 0.32 Acceptable Q5 0.32 Acceptable Q19 0.32 Acceptable Q31 0.31 Acceptable Q26 0.3 Weak Q4 0.29 Weak Q20 0.29 Weak Q23 0.29 Weak Q15 0.28 Weak Q22 0.28 Weak Q21 0.24 Weak Q24 0.06 Problematic Q32 -0.05 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified9 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q4 (r = 0.29)
    I prefer familiar environments over new ones.
  • Q15 (r = 0.28)
    I love thinking deeply and talking about big ideas and philosophy.
  • Q20 (r = 0.29)
    I enjoy activities that don't involve much reading.
  • Q21 (r = 0.24)
    I find it easier to understand information when it's spoken.
  • Q22 (r = 0.28)
    I take my time to think and decide, and I need a lot of it.
  • Q23 (r = 0.29)
    I really love certain hobbies and get super into them.
  • Q24 (r = 0.06)
    I'm good at solving problems and thinking creatively.
  • Q26 (r = 0.3)
    My handwriting might not be very neat or consistent.
  • Q32 (r = -0.05)
    I notice that I often overestimate or underestimate what I can do.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q32 ("I notice that I often overestimate or underestimate what I can do."; r = -0.04), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
ADHD Traits 64.32% 18.16 2159
Autistic Traits 63.33% 18.93 2159
Dyslexia Traits 52.13% 19.89 2159
Dyspraxia Traits 45.1% 19.92 2159
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Neurodiversity Scale (DNS).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was ADHD Traits (64.3%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Dyspraxia Traits (45.1%). The observed difference between dimensions was 19.2 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 2159
Countries 62
Collection Start Jun 9, 2026
Collection End Aug 2, 2026
Months Recorded 3
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 2159 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 2159 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Deenz Neurodiversity Scale (DNS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/neurodivergent-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset

PDF