Deenz Agoraphobia Scale (DAS-15)
normative dataset currently contains
106
participant records collected between
Jun 12, 2026
and
Oct 26, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 106 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 66.62 with a standard deviation of 17.49, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.892). Observed skewness (-0.62) and kurtosis (-0.08) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
106
Participants
26
Countries
15
Scale Items
0.892
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Deenz Agoraphobia Scale (DAS-15)
Research Status
Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity
65
/100 —
STRONG
Participants
106
Countries Represented
26
Items
15
Dimensions
3
Data Collection Period
Jun 12, 2026
–
Oct 26, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.892
Note.
The current Deenz Agoraphobia Scale (DAS-15) dataset contains 106 participant records collected from 26 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
66.62%
Median Score
71
Standard Deviation
17.49
Variance
306.03
Standard Error
1.7
95% CI Lower
63.29
95% CI Upper
69.95
Minimum Score
15%
Maximum Score
93%
Observed Range
78
Note.
M = 66.62, SD = 17.49, Median = 71. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 63.29 to 69.95.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
106
Countries
26
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
18-24
23
25-34
22
35-44
14
under18
13
45-54
9
55plus
7
prefer_not
3
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Female
55
Male
22
Prefer_not
14
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 26 countries. The largest contribution originated from US (25.5% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
US
27
25.5%
BR
14
13.2%
CA
9
8.5%
GB
7
6.6%
FR
6
5.7%
PT
5
4.7%
AR
4
3.8%
DE
4
3.8%
ES
3
2.8%
UA
3
2.8%
NL
3
2.8%
MX
2
1.9%
AU
2
1.9%
SI
2
1.9%
FI
2
1.9%
IN
2
1.9%
CH
2
1.9%
RU
1
0.9%
AT
1
0.9%
NZ
1
0.9%
DO
1
0.9%
IE
1
0.9%
GP
1
0.9%
PL
1
0.9%
T1
1
0.9%
CM
1
0.9%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
40%
Very Low
25th
55%
Below Average
50th
70%
Average
75th
80%
Above Average
90th
87%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Agoraphobia Scale (DAS-15) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 15% to 93% (M = 66.62, SD = 17.49). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.62) and kurtosis (-0.08).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.892
Reliability Classification
Good
Participants
106
Items
15
Standard Error
1.7
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
The analysis identified1
itemthat may benefit from future review.
Items Recommended for Future Review
Q15
(r = 0)
I feel calm only in familiar places.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q15 ("I feel calm only in familiar places."; r = 0.00), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Avoidance
70.33%
21.61
106
Safety Behaviors
68.44%
22.4
106
Environmental Discomfort
60.85%
14.27
106
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Agoraphobia Scale (DAS-15).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Avoidance (70.3%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Environmental Discomfort (60.9%). The observed difference between dimensions was 9.5 percentage points. Moderate variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
106
Countries
26
Collection Start
Jun 12, 2026
Collection End
Oct 26, 2026
Months Recorded
5
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
106
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
106
valid response records.
Approximately
0
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Deenz Agoraphobia Scale (DAS-15). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/agoraphobia-test/statistics/