Passive Aggression Test - Do I have Passive-aggressive Behavior

Research Dataset

Passive Aggressive Behavior Scale (PABS)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
PRELIMINARY N=13 α=0 6Countries

Passive Aggressive Behavior Scale (PABS) normative dataset currently contains 13 participant records collected between Jun 28, 2026 and Sep 7, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 13 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 48.38 with a standard deviation of 10.17, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis produced a Cronbach alpha of 0, which falls below commonly accepted psychometric standards and should be interpreted cautiously until additional data are collected. Observed skewness (-2.33) and kurtosis (5.97) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The current score distribution exhibited notable departures from normality and should be interpreted cautiously until additional normative data are collected.

13
Participants
6
Countries
48
Scale Items
0
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Passive Aggressive Behavior Scale (PABS)
Research Status Preliminary Dataset
Dataset Maturity 10 /100 — PRELIMINARY
Participants 13
Countries Represented 6
Items 48
Dimensions 12
Data Collection Period Jun 28, 2026 – Sep 7, 2026
Reliability α = 0
Note. The current Passive Aggressive Behavior Scale (PABS) dataset contains 13 participant records collected from 6 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.

Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 48.38%
Median Score 53
Standard Deviation 10.17
Variance 103.42
Standard Error 2.82
95% CI Lower 42.86
95% CI Upper 53.91
Minimum Score 19%
Maximum Score 57%
Observed Range 38
Note. M = 48.38, SD = 10.17, Median = 53. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 42.86 to 53.91.

Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 13
Countries 6
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.

Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 6 countries. The largest contribution originated from IN (38.5% of available geographic records).

Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 38% Very Low
25th 46% Below Average
50th 53% Average
75th 54% Above Average
90th 54% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Passive Aggressive Behavior Scale (PABS) sample.

Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 19% to 57% (M = 48.38, SD = 10.17). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-2.33) and kurtosis (5.97). Distribution indices suggested notable departures from normality and should be interpreted cautiously.

Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0
Reliability Classification Unacceptable
Participants 13
Items 48
Standard Error 2.82
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.

Item–Total Correlations
Insufficient Sample Size

Item–total correlations are not currently reported because the assessment has fewer than 100 participant responses. Psychometric item analysis requires a larger sample to produce stable and interpretable estimates.

Current Participants: 13
Minimum Recommended: 100

Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Resentment 60.77% 24.85 13
Distrust 56.85% 18.3 13
Suppression 54.46% 22.44 13
Blame 52.54% 16.84 13
Anger 51.62% 22.34 13
Communication 50.69% 18.01 13
Avoidance 50.62% 23.57 13
Resistance 47.77% 18.17 13
Sarcasm 41.46% 18.65 13
Withdrawal 41% 26.28 13
Procrastination 40.54% 19.02 13
Resolution 33.77% 14.75 13
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Passive Aggressive Behavior Scale (PABS).

Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Resentment (60.8%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Resolution (33.8%). The observed difference between dimensions was 27 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.

Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 13
Countries 6
Collection Start Jun 28, 2026
Collection End Sep 7, 2026
Months Recorded 4
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 13 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 13 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.


Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.


Recommended Citation

Passive Aggressive Behavior Scale (PABS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/passive-aggressive-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset