Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Multidimensional Anger Test
Research Dataset

Deenz Multidimensional Anger Scale (DMAS)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
PRELIMINARY N=44 α=0.894 14Countries
Abstract

Deenz Multidimensional Anger Scale (DMAS) normative dataset currently contains 44 participant records collected between Jun 12, 2026 and Jul 11, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 44 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 54.07 with a standard deviation of 17.82, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.894). Observed skewness (-0.15) and kurtosis (-0.83) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

44
Participants
14
Countries
20
Scale Items
0.894
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Multidimensional Anger Scale (DMAS)
Research Status Developing Dataset
Dataset Maturity 40 /100 — PRELIMINARY
Participants 44
Countries Represented 14
Items 20
Dimensions 5
Data Collection Period Jun 12, 2026 – Jul 11, 2026
Reliability α = 0.894
Note. The current Deenz Multidimensional Anger Scale (DMAS) dataset contains 44 participant records collected from 14 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 54.07%
Median Score 56
Standard Deviation 17.82
Variance 317.41
Standard Error 2.69
95% CI Lower 48.8
95% CI Upper 59.33
Minimum Score 21%
Maximum Score 85%
Observed Range 64
Note. M = 54.07, SD = 17.82, Median = 56. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 48.8 to 59.33.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 44
Countries 14
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 14 countries. The largest contribution originated from CA (22.7% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 38% Very Low
25th 38% Below Average
50th 53% Average
75th 65% Above Average
90th 76% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Multidimensional Anger Scale (DMAS) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 21% to 85% (M = 54.07, SD = 17.82). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.15) and kurtosis (-0.83). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.894
Reliability Classification Good
Participants 44
Items 20
Standard Error 2.69
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Insufficient Sample Size

Item–total correlations are not currently reported because the assessment has fewer than 100 participant responses. Psychometric item analysis requires a larger sample to produce stable and interpretable estimates.

Current Participants: 44
Minimum Recommended: 100
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Hostile Outlook 61.39% 24.16 44
Anger Arousal 59.2% 22.06 44
Range of Anger 57.02% 21.65 44
External Anger 51.7% 25.68 44
Internal Anger 42.59% 28.06 44
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Multidimensional Anger Scale (DMAS).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Hostile Outlook (61.4%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Internal Anger (42.6%). The observed difference between dimensions was 18.8 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 44
Countries 14
Collection Start Jun 12, 2026
Collection End Jul 11, 2026
Months Recorded 2
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 44 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 44 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Deenz Multidimensional Anger Scale (DMAS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/multidimensional-anger-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset

PDF