Megalophobia Test - Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20)
Research Dataset
Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20)
Normative and Psychometric Statistics
DEVELOPING
N=368
α=0.697
38Countries
Abstract
Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20)
normative dataset currently contains
368
participant records collected between
Jun 11, 2026
and
Jul 17, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 368 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 51.51 with a standard deviation of 15.72, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis produced a Cronbach alpha of 0.697, which falls below commonly accepted psychometric standards and should be interpreted cautiously until additional data are collected. Observed skewness (0.45) and kurtosis (0.37) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
368
Participants
38
Countries
20
Scale Items
0.697
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20)
Research Status
Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity
60
/100 —
DEVELOPING
Participants
368
Countries Represented
38
Items
20
Dimensions
4
Data Collection Period
Jun 11, 2026
–
Jul 17, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.697
Note.
The current Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20) dataset contains 368 participant records collected from 38 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
51.51%
Median Score
49
Standard Deviation
15.72
Variance
247.06
Standard Error
0.82
95% CI Lower
49.91
95% CI Upper
53.12
Minimum Score
6%
Maximum Score
98%
Observed Range
92
Note.
M = 51.51, SD = 15.72, Median = 49. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 49.91 to 53.12.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
368
Countries
38
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
under18
39
18-24
33
prefer_not
25
25-34
19
35-44
15
45-54
2
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Female
64
Male
61
Prefer_not
8
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 38 countries. The largest contribution originated from IN (28.5% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
IN
105
28.5%
US
57
15.5%
DE
36
9.8%
BR
23
6.3%
FR
17
4.6%
GB
15
4.1%
UA
13
3.5%
ES
11
3%
IT
9
2.4%
AR
9
2.4%
VN
7
1.9%
MX
6
1.6%
RU
6
1.6%
NL
6
1.6%
CO
6
1.6%
GR
4
1.1%
SE
3
0.8%
LT
3
0.8%
DO
3
0.8%
TH
2
0.5%
BY
2
0.5%
HU
2
0.5%
CA
2
0.5%
PL
2
0.5%
PE
2
0.5%
CZ
2
0.5%
FI
2
0.5%
CL
2
0.5%
KZ
2
0.5%
NG
1
0.3%
NP
1
0.3%
MO
1
0.3%
SG
1
0.3%
NO
1
0.3%
CN
1
0.3%
DK
1
0.3%
MN
1
0.3%
UZ
1
0.3%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
35%
Very Low
25th
40%
Below Average
50th
49%
Average
75th
60%
Above Average
90th
74%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 6% to 98% (M = 51.51, SD = 15.72). Distribution characteristics included skewness (0.45) and kurtosis (0.37).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.697
Reliability Classification
Questionable
Participants
368
Items
20
Standard Error
0.82
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
The analysis identified10
itemsthat may benefit from future review.
Items Recommended for Future Review
Q1
(r = 0.25)
Very large buildings sometimes make me feel uncomfortable.
Q2
(r = 0.19)
I prefer staying away from enormous statues or monuments.
Q3
(r = 0.1)
Massive ships or cruise liners feel intimidating to me.
Q4
(r = 0.23)
I feel uneasy when standing close to skyscrapers.
Q5
(r = 0.05)
Seeing extremely large objects can feel overwhelming.
Q7
(r = 0.02)
Large open environments usually feel comfortable to me.
Q12
(r = 0.22)
If a structure looks overwhelmingly large, I avoid getting too close.
Q13
(r = 0.19)
I sometimes avoid places known for giant monuments or buildings.
Q17
(r = 0.2)
Huge objects sometimes make me feel emotionally uneasy.
Q20
(r = -0.01)
Very large environments can sometimes feel psychologically unsettling.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q20 ("Very large environments can sometimes feel psychologically unsettling."; r = -0.01), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Size Fear
60.07%
24.47
368
Environmental Anxiety
51.79%
22.77
368
Object Avoidance
50%
20.98
368
Visual Discomfort
45.18%
18.5
368
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Size Fear (60.1%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Visual Discomfort (45.2%). The observed difference between dimensions was 14.9 percentage points. Moderate variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
368
Countries
38
Collection Start
Jun 11, 2026
Collection End
Jul 17, 2026
Months Recorded
2
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
368
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
368
valid response records.
Approximately
0
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/megalophobia-test/statistics/