Ψ Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool
🏠 Main Page 📝 Questionnaire
Research Dataset

Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
STRONG N=267 α=0.743 28Countries

Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20) normative dataset currently contains 267 participant records collected between Jun 11, 2026 and Jun 27, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 267 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 48.48 with a standard deviation of 13.13, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.743). Observed skewness (0.8) and kurtosis (1.56) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

267
Participants
28
Countries
20
Items
0.743
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20)
Research Status Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity 70 /100 — STRONG
Participants 267
Countries Represented 28
Items 20
Dimensions 4
Data Collection Period Jun 11, 2026 – Jun 27, 2026
Reliability α = 0.743
Note. The current Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20) dataset contains 267 participant records collected from 28 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.

Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 48.48%
Median Score 49
Standard Deviation 13.13
Variance 172.51
Standard Error 0.8
95% CI Lower 46.9
95% CI Upper 50.05
Minimum Score 9%
Maximum Score 98%
Observed Range 89
Note. M = 48.48, SD = 13.13, Median = 49. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 46.9 to 50.05.

Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 267
Countries 28
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.

Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 28 countries. The largest contribution originated from IN (37.8% of available geographic records).

Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 35% Very Low
25th 40% Below Average
50th 49% Average
75th 55% Above Average
90th 65% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20) sample.

Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 9% to 98% (M = 48.48, SD = 13.13). Distribution characteristics included skewness (0.8) and kurtosis (1.56). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.

Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.743
Reliability Classification Acceptable
Participants 267
Items 20
Standard Error 0.8
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.

Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q14 0.56 Excellent Q18 0.56 Excellent Q11 0.52 Excellent Q6 0.5 Excellent Q16 0.47 Acceptable Q9 0.44 Acceptable Q15 0.41 Acceptable Q8 0.41 Acceptable Q12 0.4 Acceptable Q19 0.37 Acceptable Q10 0.36 Acceptable Q13 0.31 Acceptable Q1 0.29 Weak Q17 0.26 Weak Q4 0.23 Weak Q2 0.2 Weak Q3 0.07 Problematic Q5 0.03 Problematic Q7 0.02 Problematic Q20 -0.12 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified8 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q1 (r = 0.29)
    Very large buildings sometimes make me feel uncomfortable.
  • Q2 (r = 0.2)
    I prefer staying away from enormous statues or monuments.
  • Q3 (r = 0.07)
    Massive ships or cruise liners feel intimidating to me.
  • Q4 (r = 0.23)
    I feel uneasy when standing close to skyscrapers.
  • Q5 (r = 0.03)
    Seeing extremely large objects can feel overwhelming.
  • Q7 (r = 0.02)
    Large open environments usually feel comfortable to me.
  • Q17 (r = 0.26)
    Huge objects sometimes make me feel emotionally uneasy.
  • Q20 (r = -0.12)
    Very large environments can sometimes feel psychologically unsettling.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q20 ("Very large environments can sometimes feel psychologically unsettling."; r = -0.12), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.

Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Size Fear 59.22% 22.97 173
Environmental Anxiety 47.57% 23.14 173
Object Avoidance 44.34% 16.72 173
Visual Discomfort 43.76% 16.45 173
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20).

Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Size Fear (59.2%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Visual Discomfort (43.8%). The observed difference between dimensions was 15.5 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.

Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 267
Countries 28
Collection Start Jun 11, 2026
Collection End Jun 27, 2026
Months Recorded 1
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 267 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 173 valid response records. Approximately 94 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.


Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.


Recommended Citation

Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/megalophobia-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset