Emotional Abuse Test - Have You Been Emotionally Abused Quiz?
Research Dataset
Deenz Emotional Abuse Scale (DEAS)
Normative and Psychometric Statistics
ROBUST
N=672
α=0.915
54Countries
Abstract
Deenz Emotional Abuse Scale (DEAS)
normative dataset currently contains
672
participant records collected between
Jun 11, 2026
and
Nov 2, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 672 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 61.64 with a standard deviation of 13.76, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.915). Observed skewness (-0.25) and kurtosis (0.45) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
672
Participants
54
Countries
48
Scale Items
0.915
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Deenz Emotional Abuse Scale (DEAS)
Research Status
Robust Dataset
Dataset Maturity
90
/100 —
ROBUST
Participants
672
Countries Represented
54
Items
48
Dimensions
6
Data Collection Period
Jun 11, 2026
–
Nov 2, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.915
Note.
The current Deenz Emotional Abuse Scale (DEAS) dataset contains 672 participant records collected from 54 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
61.64%
Median Score
63
Standard Deviation
13.76
Variance
189.47
Standard Error
0.53
95% CI Lower
60.59
95% CI Upper
62.68
Minimum Score
10%
Maximum Score
98%
Observed Range
88
Note.
M = 61.64, SD = 13.76, Median = 63. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 60.59 to 62.68.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
672
Countries
54
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
under18
134
25-34
115
18-24
101
35-44
64
45-54
50
prefer_not
24
55plus
20
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Female
309
Male
137
Prefer_not
62
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 54 countries. The largest contribution originated from US (34.2% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
US
230
34.2%
DE
131
19.5%
GB
69
10.3%
CA
32
4.8%
AE
32
4.8%
FR
22
3.3%
AU
21
3.1%
ES
14
2.1%
PL
8
1.2%
SE
7
1%
IE
7
1%
AT
7
1%
NL
7
1%
KW
5
0.7%
PH
5
0.7%
BR
4
0.6%
EG
4
0.6%
IN
4
0.6%
ZA
4
0.6%
PT
4
0.6%
NO
4
0.6%
ID
3
0.4%
DK
3
0.4%
CH
3
0.4%
FI
2
0.3%
GU
2
0.3%
BY
2
0.3%
CZ
2
0.3%
HK
2
0.3%
MA
2
0.3%
HR
2
0.3%
KZ
2
0.3%
VN
2
0.3%
T1
2
0.3%
SG
2
0.3%
NP
2
0.3%
CR
1
0.1%
IT
1
0.1%
UY
1
0.1%
RO
1
0.1%
PR
1
0.1%
UA
1
0.1%
AR
1
0.1%
ZM
1
0.1%
HU
1
0.1%
BD
1
0.1%
EE
1
0.1%
SA
1
0.1%
NZ
1
0.1%
RS
1
0.1%
BE
1
0.1%
TR
1
0.1%
AZ
1
0.1%
LV
1
0.1%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
45%
Very Low
25th
53%
Below Average
50th
63%
Average
75th
71%
Above Average
90th
79%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Emotional Abuse Scale (DEAS) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 10% to 98% (M = 61.64, SD = 13.76). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.25) and kurtosis (0.45).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.915
Reliability Classification
Excellent
Participants
672
Items
48
Standard Error
0.53
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
The analysis identified1
itemthat may benefit from future review.
Items Recommended for Future Review
Q8
(r = 0.29)
I feel proud of the things I do well.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q8 ("I feel proud of the things I do well."; r = 0.29), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Distrust
65.73%
17.43
672
Restraint
65.66%
17.6
672
Inadequacy
63.41%
16.91
672
Submissiveness
61.09%
18.42
672
Vulnerability
59.64%
15.12
672
Dependency
54.66%
20.92
672
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Emotional Abuse Scale (DEAS).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Distrust (65.7%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Dependency (54.7%). The observed difference between dimensions was 11.1 percentage points. Moderate variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
672
Countries
54
Collection Start
Jun 11, 2026
Collection End
Nov 2, 2026
Months Recorded
6
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
672
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
672
valid response records.
Approximately
0
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Deenz Emotional Abuse Scale (DEAS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/emotional-abuse-test/statistics/