Body Dysmorphia Test | Deenz Body Dysmorphic Scale (DBDS-20)

Research Dataset

Deenz Body Dysmorphic Scale (DBDS)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
ROBUST N=529 α=0.91 32Countries

Deenz Body Dysmorphic Scale (DBDS) normative dataset currently contains 529 participant records collected between Jun 11, 2026 and Aug 22, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 529 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 59.92 with a standard deviation of 16.2, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.91). Observed skewness (-0.44) and kurtosis (0.09) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

529
Participants
32
Countries
20
Scale Items
0.91
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Body Dysmorphic Scale (DBDS)
Research Status Robust Dataset
Dataset Maturity 90 /100 — ROBUST
Participants 529
Countries Represented 32
Items 20
Dimensions 5
Data Collection Period Jun 11, 2026 – Aug 22, 2026
Reliability α = 0.91
Note. The current Deenz Body Dysmorphic Scale (DBDS) dataset contains 529 participant records collected from 32 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.

Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 59.92%
Median Score 61
Standard Deviation 16.2
Variance 262.42
Standard Error 0.7
95% CI Lower 58.54
95% CI Upper 61.3
Minimum Score 6%
Maximum Score 95%
Observed Range 89
Note. M = 59.92, SD = 16.2, Median = 61. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 58.54 to 61.3.

Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 529
Countries 32
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.

Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 32 countries. The largest contribution originated from DE (59.4% of available geographic records).

Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 39% Very Low
25th 51% Below Average
50th 61% Average
75th 71% Above Average
90th 80% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Body Dysmorphic Scale (DBDS) sample.

Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 6% to 95% (M = 59.92, SD = 16.2). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.44) and kurtosis (0.09). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.

Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.91
Reliability Classification Excellent
Participants 529
Items 20
Standard Error 0.7
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.

Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q9 0.72 Excellent Q12 0.67 Excellent Q17 0.65 Excellent Q1 0.64 Excellent Q18 0.64 Excellent Q3 0.63 Excellent Q6 0.62 Excellent Q10 0.62 Excellent Q4 0.62 Excellent Q2 0.59 Excellent Q15 0.59 Excellent Q16 0.57 Excellent Q14 0.55 Excellent Q19 0.55 Excellent Q11 0.53 Excellent Q8 0.47 Acceptable Q7 0.46 Acceptable Q13 0.45 Acceptable Q5 0.39 Acceptable Q20 0 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified1 itemthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q20 (r = 0)
    I struggle to express myself emotionally in relationships due to my appearance concerns.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q20 ("I struggle to express myself emotionally in relationships due to my appearance concerns."; r = 0.00), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.

Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Appearance Obsession 80.73% 18.08 529
Negative Self-Image 71.56% 22.26 529
Repetitive Behaviors 68.61% 21.89 529
Social Avoidance 48.42% 22.77 529
Functional Impairment 31.6% 19.67 529
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Body Dysmorphic Scale (DBDS).

Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Appearance Obsession (80.7%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Functional Impairment (31.6%). The observed difference between dimensions was 49.1 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.

Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 529
Countries 32
Collection Start Jun 11, 2026
Collection End Aug 22, 2026
Months Recorded 3
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 529 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 529 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.


Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.


Recommended Citation

Deenz Body Dysmorphic Scale (DBDS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/do-i-have-bdd-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset


PDF