Deenz Cyclothymia Scale (DSC-32)
normative dataset currently contains
620
participant records collected between
Jun 6, 2026
and
Jul 13, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 620 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 69.83 with a standard deviation of 13.71, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.913). Observed skewness (-0.86) and kurtosis (2.09) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
620
Participants
45
Countries
32
Scale Items
0.913
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Deenz Cyclothymia Scale (DSC-32)
Research Status
Robust Dataset
Dataset Maturity
90
/100 —
ROBUST
Participants
620
Countries Represented
45
Items
32
Dimensions
4
Data Collection Period
Jun 6, 2026
–
Jul 13, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.913
Note.
The current Deenz Cyclothymia Scale (DSC-32) dataset contains 620 participant records collected from 45 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
69.83%
Median Score
71
Standard Deviation
13.71
Variance
188.04
Standard Error
0.55
95% CI Lower
68.75
95% CI Upper
70.91
Minimum Score
2%
Maximum Score
97%
Observed Range
95
Note.
M = 69.83, SD = 13.71, Median = 71. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 68.75 to 70.91.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
620
Countries
45
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
18-24
82
25-34
64
prefer_not
51
35-44
46
under18
41
45-54
17
55plus
8
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Female
194
Male
106
Prefer_not
9
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 45 countries. The largest contribution originated from BR (19.8% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
BR
123
19.8%
US
84
13.5%
UA
83
13.4%
DE
63
10.2%
FR
62
10%
ES
21
3.4%
NL
19
3.1%
GB
13
2.1%
BY
12
1.9%
SE
11
1.8%
FI
11
1.8%
RU
10
1.6%
PL
9
1.5%
AR
8
1.3%
CL
7
1.1%
CA
6
1%
IN
6
1%
PR
5
0.8%
MX
5
0.8%
IT
5
0.8%
CO
4
0.6%
KZ
4
0.6%
PT
4
0.6%
VE
4
0.6%
NO
3
0.5%
CH
3
0.5%
PH
3
0.5%
MD
3
0.5%
AU
3
0.5%
AT
3
0.5%
BE
3
0.5%
QA
2
0.3%
CR
2
0.3%
GT
2
0.3%
BG
2
0.3%
GE
2
0.3%
GR
2
0.3%
TR
1
0.2%
HR
1
0.2%
EC
1
0.2%
DK
1
0.2%
AM
1
0.2%
HK
1
0.2%
SG
1
0.2%
SK
1
0.2%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
53%
Very Low
25th
63%
Below Average
50th
71%
Average
75th
79%
Above Average
90th
87%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Cyclothymia Scale (DSC-32) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 2% to 97% (M = 69.83, SD = 13.71). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.86) and kurtosis (2.09).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.913
Reliability Classification
Excellent
Participants
620
Items
32
Standard Error
0.55
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
The analysis identified1
itemthat may benefit from future review.
Items Recommended for Future Review
Q32
(r = 0.04)
I notice that I often overestimate or underestimate what I can do.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q32 ("I notice that I often overestimate or underestimate what I can do."; r = 0.04), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Depressive
77.04%
17.18
620
Mood Instability
71.8%
19.76
620
Cognitive
67.11%
16.59
620
Hypomanic
63.45%
17.23
620
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Cyclothymia Scale (DSC-32).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Depressive (77%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Hypomanic (63.5%). The observed difference between dimensions was 13.6 percentage points. Moderate variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
620
Countries
45
Collection Start
Jun 6, 2026
Collection End
Jul 13, 2026
Months Recorded
2
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
620
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
620
valid response records.
Approximately
0
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Deenz Cyclothymia Scale (DSC-32). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/cyclothymia-test/statistics/