Deenz Antisocial Personality Scale (DAPS-R)
normative dataset currently contains
1093
participant records collected between
Jun 5, 2026
and
Jul 11, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 1093 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 56.86 with a standard deviation of 18.9, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.921). Observed skewness (-0.38) and kurtosis (-0.34) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
1093
Participants
59
Countries
24
Scale Items
0.921
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Deenz Antisocial Personality Scale (DAPS-R)
Research Status
Robust Dataset
Dataset Maturity
100
/100 —
ROBUST
Participants
1093
Countries Represented
59
Items
24
Dimensions
8
Data Collection Period
Jun 5, 2026
–
Jul 11, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.921
Note.
The current Deenz Antisocial Personality Scale (DAPS-R) dataset contains 1093 participant records collected from 59 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
56.86%
Median Score
59
Standard Deviation
18.9
Variance
357.17
Standard Error
0.57
95% CI Lower
55.74
95% CI Upper
57.98
Minimum Score
2%
Maximum Score
100%
Observed Range
98
Note.
M = 56.86, SD = 18.9, Median = 59. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 55.74 to 57.98.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
1093
Countries
59
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
18-24
139
under18
99
prefer_not
88
25-34
68
35-44
33
45-54
11
55plus
7
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Male
257
Female
170
Prefer_not
18
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 59 countries. The largest contribution originated from DE (17.7% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
DE
193
17.7%
FR
193
17.7%
BR
176
16.1%
US
126
11.5%
IN
69
6.3%
ES
51
4.7%
UA
50
4.6%
NL
26
2.4%
PY
17
1.6%
AU
15
1.4%
GB
13
1.2%
AT
13
1.2%
RU
10
0.9%
PT
9
0.8%
CH
8
0.7%
MX
7
0.6%
BY
7
0.6%
FI
7
0.6%
RS
6
0.5%
AR
5
0.5%
CA
5
0.5%
KZ
5
0.5%
CL
5
0.5%
CZ
5
0.5%
IL
4
0.4%
BE
4
0.4%
LV
4
0.4%
PH
3
0.3%
GE
3
0.3%
PL
3
0.3%
PE
3
0.3%
SE
3
0.3%
NZ
3
0.3%
NC
2
0.2%
GA
2
0.2%
SK
2
0.2%
MA
2
0.2%
DZ
2
0.2%
IT
2
0.2%
JP
2
0.2%
IE
2
0.2%
TR
2
0.2%
NO
2
0.2%
EC
2
0.2%
MG
2
0.2%
CN
2
0.2%
SG
2
0.2%
GR
2
0.2%
T1
2
0.2%
RE
1
0.1%
BO
1
0.1%
MN
1
0.1%
PK
1
0.1%
CO
1
0.1%
VN
1
0.1%
UY
1
0.1%
TW
1
0.1%
HN
1
0.1%
KG
1
0.1%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
30%
Very Low
25th
44%
Below Average
50th
59%
Average
75th
71%
Above Average
90th
79%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Antisocial Personality Scale (DAPS-R) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 2% to 100% (M = 56.86, SD = 18.9). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.38) and kurtosis (-0.34).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.921
Reliability Classification
Excellent
Participants
1093
Items
24
Standard Error
0.57
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
The analysis identified1
itemthat may benefit from future review.
Items Recommended for Future Review
Q24
(r = 0.04)
I rarely learn from my “oops” moments — keeps life interesting.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q24 ("I rarely learn from my “oops” moments — keeps life interesting."; r = 0.04), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Aggressiveness
67.32%
25.1
1093
Glibness
66.21%
27.34
1093
Deceitfulness
64.58%
26.89
1093
Irresponsibility
59.58%
25.41
1093
Callousness
54.98%
27.19
1093
Impulsivity
54.74%
25.84
1093
Apathy
50.3%
24.37
1093
Obtuseness
37.87%
21.46
1093
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Antisocial Personality Scale (DAPS-R).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Aggressiveness (67.3%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Obtuseness (37.9%). The observed difference between dimensions was 29.5 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
1093
Countries
59
Collection Start
Jun 5, 2026
Collection End
Jul 11, 2026
Months Recorded
2
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
1093
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
1093
valid response records.
Approximately
0
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Deenz Antisocial Personality Scale (DAPS-R). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/sociopath-test/statistics/