Deenz Antisocial Personality Scale (DAPS-R)
normative dataset currently contains
832
participant records collected between
Jun 5, 2026
and
Jun 27, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 832 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 56.63 with a standard deviation of 19.36, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.925). Observed skewness (-0.38) and kurtosis (-0.41) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
832
Participants
45
Countries
24
Items
0.925
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Deenz Antisocial Personality Scale (DAPS-R)
Research Status
Robust Dataset
Dataset Maturity
90
/100 —
ROBUST
Participants
832
Countries Represented
45
Items
24
Dimensions
8
Data Collection Period
Jun 5, 2026
–
Jun 27, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.925
Note.
The current Deenz Antisocial Personality Scale (DAPS-R) dataset contains 832 participant records collected from 45 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
56.63%
Median Score
58
Standard Deviation
19.36
Variance
374.72
Standard Error
0.67
95% CI Lower
55.31
95% CI Upper
57.94
Minimum Score
3%
Maximum Score
100%
Observed Range
97
Note.
M = 56.63, SD = 19.36, Median = 58. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 55.31 to 57.94.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
832
Countries
45
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
18-24
64
prefer_not
51
under18
37
25-34
25
35-44
17
45-54
5
55plus
4
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Male
120
Female
73
Prefer_not
10
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 45 countries. The largest contribution originated from FR (18.8% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
FR
156
18.8%
DE
139
16.7%
BR
120
14.4%
US
109
13.1%
IN
66
7.9%
ES
41
4.9%
UA
33
4%
NL
17
2%
PY
17
2%
AU
15
1.8%
AT
12
1.4%
GB
7
0.8%
CH
7
0.8%
RU
7
0.8%
BY
6
0.7%
FI
6
0.7%
CA
5
0.6%
CZ
5
0.6%
PT
4
0.5%
IL
4
0.5%
RS
4
0.5%
KZ
4
0.5%
MX
4
0.5%
PH
3
0.4%
PE
3
0.4%
AR
3
0.4%
DZ
2
0.2%
GE
2
0.2%
PL
2
0.2%
JP
2
0.2%
IE
2
0.2%
TR
2
0.2%
NO
2
0.2%
EC
2
0.2%
NZ
2
0.2%
MG
2
0.2%
CN
2
0.2%
SG
2
0.2%
T1
2
0.2%
NC
2
0.2%
GA
2
0.2%
SK
2
0.2%
BE
1
0.1%
CL
1
0.1%
UY
1
0.1%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
30%
Very Low
25th
44%
Below Average
50th
58%
Average
75th
71%
Above Average
90th
79%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Antisocial Personality Scale (DAPS-R) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 3% to 100% (M = 56.63, SD = 19.36). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.38) and kurtosis (-0.41).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.925
Reliability Classification
Excellent
Participants
832
Items
24
Standard Error
0.67
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
The analysis identified1
itemthat may benefit from future review.
Items Recommended for Future Review
Q24
(r = 0.06)
I rarely learn from my “oops” moments — keeps life interesting.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q24 ("I rarely learn from my “oops” moments — keeps life interesting."; r = 0.06), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Aggressiveness
63.34%
28.66
323
Glibness
62.21%
30.05
323
Deceitfulness
59.53%
28.73
323
Irresponsibility
56.78%
25.49
323
Impulsivity
52.7%
25.87
323
Callousness
50.2%
29.51
323
Apathy
45.3%
24.27
323
Obtuseness
38.95%
24.98
323
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Antisocial Personality Scale (DAPS-R).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Aggressiveness (63.3%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Obtuseness (39%). The observed difference between dimensions was 24.4 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
832
Countries
45
Collection Start
Jun 5, 2026
Collection End
Jun 27, 2026
Months Recorded
1
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
832
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
323
valid response records.
Approximately
509
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Deenz Antisocial Personality Scale (DAPS-R). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/sociopath-test/statistics/