Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Sexual Orientation Test – Kinsey-Style Continuum Scale
Research Dataset

Kinsey-Style Sexual Orientation Scale (KSOS-20)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
ROBUST N=2010 α=0.782 62Countries
Abstract

Kinsey-Style Sexual Orientation Scale (KSOS-20) normative dataset currently contains 2010 participant records collected between Jun 10, 2026 and Jul 11, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 2010 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 62.07 with a standard deviation of 13.79, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.782). Observed skewness (-0.83) and kurtosis (1.65) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

2010
Participants
62
Countries
20
Scale Items
0.782
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Kinsey-Style Sexual Orientation Scale (KSOS-20)
Research Status Robust Dataset
Dataset Maturity 90 /100 — ROBUST
Participants 2010
Countries Represented 62
Items 20
Dimensions 5
Data Collection Period Jun 10, 2026 – Jul 11, 2026
Reliability α = 0.782
Note. The current Kinsey-Style Sexual Orientation Scale (KSOS-20) dataset contains 2010 participant records collected from 62 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 62.07%
Median Score 64
Standard Deviation 13.79
Variance 190.28
Standard Error 0.31
95% CI Lower 61.46
95% CI Upper 62.67
Minimum Score 0%
Maximum Score 95%
Observed Range 95
Note. M = 62.07, SD = 13.79, Median = 64. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 61.46 to 62.67.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 2010
Countries 62
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 62 countries. The largest contribution originated from DE (19.3% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 44% Very Low
25th 55% Below Average
50th 64% Average
75th 71% Above Average
90th 78% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Kinsey-Style Sexual Orientation Scale (KSOS-20) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 0% to 95% (M = 62.07, SD = 13.79). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.83) and kurtosis (1.65). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.782
Reliability Classification Acceptable
Participants 2010
Items 20
Standard Error 0.31
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q14 0.65 Excellent Q13 0.63 Excellent Q11 0.59 Excellent Q4 0.56 Excellent Q10 0.54 Excellent Q3 0.51 Excellent Q9 0.49 Acceptable Q2 0.48 Acceptable Q1 0.47 Acceptable Q15 0.44 Acceptable Q12 0.36 Acceptable Q5 0.28 Weak Q6 0.23 Weak Q7 0.22 Weak Q16 0.2 Problematic Q8 0.16 Problematic Q19 0.13 Problematic Q18 0.08 Problematic Q17 -0.05 Problematic Q20 -0.06 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified9 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q5 (r = 0.28)
    I have felt romantic attraction toward someone of the opposite sex.
  • Q6 (r = 0.23)
    I have felt physical attraction toward someone of the opposite sex.
  • Q7 (r = 0.22)
    I have imagined being in a long-term relationship with someone of the opposite sex.
  • Q8 (r = 0.16)
    I often notice people of the opposite sex in an attractive way.
  • Q16 (r = 0.2)
    I feel comfortable discussing sexuality openly.
  • Q17 (r = -0.05)
    I rarely experience strong sexual attraction toward anyone.
  • Q18 (r = 0.08)
    Sexual attraction plays a small role in my relationships.
  • Q19 (r = 0.13)
    I can enjoy emotional intimacy without sexual attraction.
  • Q20 (r = -0.06)
    I often experience little or no sexual desire.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q20 ("I often experience little or no sexual desire."; r = -0.06), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Orientation Exploration 75.7% 28.27 2010
Opposite-Sex Attraction 72.03% 27.63 2010
Behavioral Openness 71.8% 23.63 2010
Same-Sex Attraction 64.16% 30.47 2010
Asexual Traits 58.46% 25.09 2010
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Kinsey-Style Sexual Orientation Scale (KSOS-20).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Orientation Exploration (75.7%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Asexual Traits (58.5%). The observed difference between dimensions was 17.2 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 2010
Countries 62
Collection Start Jun 10, 2026
Collection End Jul 11, 2026
Months Recorded 2
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 2010 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 2010 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Kinsey-Style Sexual Orientation Scale (KSOS-20). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/sexual-orientation-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset

PDF