Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Philophobia Test – Fear of Love and Intimacy Assessment (FLIA)

Research Dataset

Fear of Love and Intimacy Assessment (FLIA)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
STRONG N=165 α=0.833 33Countries
Abstract

Fear of Love and Intimacy Assessment (FLIA) normative dataset currently contains 165 participant records collected between Jun 23, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 165 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 58.25 with a standard deviation of 9.5, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.833). Observed skewness (-0.84) and kurtosis (1.95) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

165
Participants
33
Countries
36
Scale Items
0.833
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Fear of Love and Intimacy Assessment (FLIA)
Research Status Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity 65 /100 — STRONG
Participants 165
Countries Represented 33
Items 36
Dimensions 5
Data Collection Period Jun 23, 2026 – Sep 21, 2026
Reliability α = 0.833
Note. The current Fear of Love and Intimacy Assessment (FLIA) dataset contains 165 participant records collected from 33 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 58.25%
Median Score 60
Standard Deviation 9.5
Variance 90.22
Standard Error 0.74
95% CI Lower 56.81
95% CI Upper 59.7
Minimum Score 13%
Maximum Score 76%
Observed Range 63
Note. M = 58.25, SD = 9.5, Median = 60. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 56.81 to 59.7.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 165
Countries 33
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 33 countries. The largest contribution originated from US (27.9% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 47% Very Low
25th 50% Below Average
50th 60% Average
75th 65% Above Average
90th 69% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Fear of Love and Intimacy Assessment (FLIA) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 13% to 76% (M = 58.25, SD = 9.5). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.84) and kurtosis (1.95). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.833
Reliability Classification Good
Participants 165
Items 36
Standard Error 0.74
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q33 0.73 Excellent Q32 0.72 Excellent Q34 0.72 Excellent Q36 0.71 Excellent Q35 0.7 Excellent Q31 0.69 Excellent Q25 0.67 Excellent Q30 0.64 Excellent Q28 0.64 Excellent Q26 0.62 Excellent Q29 0.58 Excellent Q27 0.51 Excellent Q18 0.4 Acceptable Q1 0.4 Acceptable Q3 0.38 Acceptable Q17 0.37 Acceptable Q2 0.32 Acceptable Q4 0.29 Weak Q6 0.29 Weak Q5 0.26 Weak Q7 0.23 Weak Q12 0.23 Weak Q10 0.23 Weak Q24 0.23 Weak Q11 0.2 Weak Q9 0.17 Problematic Q23 0.13 Problematic Q14 0.07 Problematic Q13 0.03 Problematic Q15 -0.04 Problematic Q8 -0.05 Problematic Q16 -0.05 Problematic Q22 -0.07 Problematic Q20 -0.19 Problematic Q19 -0.22 Problematic Q21 -0.25 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified19 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q4 (r = 0.29)
    I struggle to forget a painful breakup.
  • Q5 (r = 0.26)
    Past relationships rarely affect me now.
  • Q6 (r = 0.29)
    I have largely moved on from past heartbreak.
  • Q7 (r = 0.23)
    I worry people may leave me.
  • Q8 (r = -0.05)
    Trust does not come easily to me.
  • Q9 (r = 0.17)
    I expect relationships to disappoint me.
  • Q10 (r = 0.23)
    I fear becoming emotionally dependent.
  • Q11 (r = 0.2)
    I usually feel secure in close relationships.
  • Q12 (r = 0.23)
    I find it easy to trust people I care about.
  • Q13 (r = 0.03)
    Sharing deep feelings feels risky.
  • Q14 (r = 0.07)
    Being emotionally open feels uncomfortable.
  • Q15 (r = -0.04)
    I dislike relying on others emotionally.
  • Q16 (r = -0.05)
    Strong romantic feelings make me uneasy.
  • Q19 (r = -0.22)
    I keep emotional distance from others.
  • Q20 (r = -0.19)
    I avoid romantic opportunities.
  • Q21 (r = -0.25)
    I pull away when relationships deepen.
  • Q22 (r = -0.07)
    Commitment feels restrictive.
  • Q23 (r = 0.13)
    I enjoy building close relationships.
  • Q24 (r = 0.23)
    I welcome emotional closeness when it develops.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q21 ("I pull away when relationships deepen."; r = -0.25), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Fear of Vulnerability 68.18% 19.64 165
Attachment Insecurity 66.42% 18.75 165
Past Relationship Trauma 60.06% 21.2 165
Relationship Avoidance 54.72% 21.62 165
Relationship Readiness 50.18% 10.23 165
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Fear of Love and Intimacy Assessment (FLIA).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Fear of Vulnerability (68.2%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Relationship Readiness (50.2%). The observed difference between dimensions was 18 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 165
Countries 33
Collection Start Jun 23, 2026
Collection End Sep 21, 2026
Months Recorded 4
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 165 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 165 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Fear of Love and Intimacy Assessment (FLIA). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/philophobia-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset