Deenz Narcissistic Personality Scale (DNPS)
normative dataset currently contains
242
participant records collected between
Jun 11, 2026
and
Sep 8, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 242 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 44.23 with a standard deviation of 22.24, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.962). Observed skewness (0.43) and kurtosis (-0.48) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
242
Participants
42
Countries
32
Scale Items
0.962
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Deenz Narcissistic Personality Scale (DNPS)
Research Status
Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity
70
/100 —
STRONG
Participants
242
Countries Represented
42
Items
32
Dimensions
8
Data Collection Period
Jun 11, 2026
–
Sep 8, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.962
Note.
The current Deenz Narcissistic Personality Scale (DNPS) dataset contains 242 participant records collected from 42 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
44.23%
Median Score
38.5
Standard Deviation
22.24
Variance
494.72
Standard Error
1.43
95% CI Lower
41.43
95% CI Upper
47.03
Minimum Score
2%
Maximum Score
97%
Observed Range
95
Note.
M = 44.23, SD = 22.24, Median = 38.5. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 41.43 to 47.03.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
242
Countries
42
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
18-24
44
under18
31
35-44
29
25-34
28
55plus
26
45-54
23
prefer_not
15
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Female
93
Male
90
Prefer_not
13
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 42 countries. The largest contribution originated from FR (16.1% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
FR
39
16.1%
DE
33
13.6%
US
29
12%
BR
20
8.3%
ES
17
7%
UA
11
4.5%
CA
9
3.7%
RU
8
3.3%
GB
8
3.3%
AT
7
2.9%
NL
6
2.5%
MA
4
1.7%
LV
4
1.7%
CZ
4
1.7%
SG
3
1.2%
BE
3
1.2%
FI
3
1.2%
NO
2
0.8%
CH
2
0.8%
CO
2
0.8%
AR
2
0.8%
CN
2
0.8%
VE
2
0.8%
RO
2
0.8%
EE
2
0.8%
PT
2
0.8%
CL
1
0.4%
PK
1
0.4%
HT
1
0.4%
HU
1
0.4%
GE
1
0.4%
ZA
1
0.4%
PL
1
0.4%
IN
1
0.4%
TR
1
0.4%
AU
1
0.4%
NZ
1
0.4%
MX
1
0.4%
PH
1
0.4%
PR
1
0.4%
UY
1
0.4%
HK
1
0.4%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
18%
Very Low
25th
29%
Below Average
50th
38%
Average
75th
61%
Above Average
90th
75%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Narcissistic Personality Scale (DNPS) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 2% to 97% (M = 44.23, SD = 22.24). Distribution characteristics included skewness (0.43) and kurtosis (-0.48).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.962
Reliability Classification
Excellent
Participants
242
Items
32
Standard Error
1.43
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
The analysis identified1
itemthat may benefit from future review.
Items Recommended for Future Review
Q32
(r = 0.08)
I often feel that others should listen to my advice.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q32 ("I often feel that others should listen to my advice."; r = 0.08), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Specialness
52.04%
25.46
242
Grandiosity
51.44%
25.3
242
Fantasy
48.12%
31.05
242
Envy
45.8%
29.4
242
Arrogance
41.37%
20.32
242
Entitlement
41.02%
27.19
242
Exploitation
40.59%
28.8
242
Lack of Empathy
34.37%
28.1
242
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Narcissistic Personality Scale (DNPS).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Specialness (52%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Lack of Empathy (34.4%). The observed difference between dimensions was 17.7 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
242
Countries
42
Collection Start
Jun 11, 2026
Collection End
Sep 8, 2026
Months Recorded
4
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
242
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
242
valid response records.
Approximately
0
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Deenz Narcissistic Personality Scale (DNPS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/narcissistic-personality-test/statistics/