Deenz Narcissistic Personality Scale (DNPS)
normative dataset currently contains
293
participant records collected between
Jun 11, 2026
and
Oct 10, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 293 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 44.45 with a standard deviation of 22.68, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.964). Observed skewness (0.39) and kurtosis (-0.5) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
293
Participants
45
Countries
32
Scale Items
0.964
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Deenz Narcissistic Personality Scale (DNPS)
Research Status
Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity
80
/100 —
STRONG
Participants
293
Countries Represented
45
Items
32
Dimensions
8
Data Collection Period
Jun 11, 2026
–
Oct 10, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.964
Note.
The current Deenz Narcissistic Personality Scale (DNPS) dataset contains 293 participant records collected from 45 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
44.45%
Median Score
40
Standard Deviation
22.68
Variance
514.18
Standard Error
1.32
95% CI Lower
41.85
95% CI Upper
47.05
Minimum Score
0%
Maximum Score
97%
Observed Range
97
Note.
M = 44.45, SD = 22.68, Median = 40. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 41.85 to 47.05.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
293
Countries
45
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
18-24
52
under18
43
35-44
40
25-34
35
55plus
31
45-54
28
prefer_not
18
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Male
118
Female
113
Prefer_not
16
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 45 countries. The largest contribution originated from FR (15.7% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
FR
46
15.7%
DE
37
12.6%
US
33
11.3%
BR
32
10.9%
ES
19
6.5%
UA
13
4.4%
CA
11
3.8%
GB
9
3.1%
RU
8
2.7%
LV
8
2.7%
AT
8
2.7%
NL
8
2.7%
MA
4
1.4%
SG
4
1.4%
CZ
4
1.4%
CH
3
1%
CO
3
1%
BE
3
1%
FI
3
1%
RO
3
1%
NO
2
0.7%
PL
2
0.7%
AR
2
0.7%
IN
2
0.7%
VE
2
0.7%
CN
2
0.7%
MX
2
0.7%
EE
2
0.7%
PT
2
0.7%
CL
1
0.3%
KZ
1
0.3%
HT
1
0.3%
PK
1
0.3%
ZA
1
0.3%
HU
1
0.3%
GE
1
0.3%
CI
1
0.3%
TR
1
0.3%
AU
1
0.3%
NZ
1
0.3%
SE
1
0.3%
PR
1
0.3%
PH
1
0.3%
UY
1
0.3%
HK
1
0.3%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
18%
Very Low
25th
29%
Below Average
50th
40%
Average
75th
62%
Above Average
90th
77%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Narcissistic Personality Scale (DNPS) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 0% to 97% (M = 44.45, SD = 22.68). Distribution characteristics included skewness (0.39) and kurtosis (-0.5).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.964
Reliability Classification
Excellent
Participants
293
Items
32
Standard Error
1.32
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
The analysis identified1
itemthat may benefit from future review.
Items Recommended for Future Review
Q32
(r = 0.07)
I often feel that others should listen to my advice.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q32 ("I often feel that others should listen to my advice."; r = 0.07), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Grandiosity
51.23%
25.71
293
Specialness
51.14%
25.79
293
Fantasy
48.4%
30.98
293
Envy
46.2%
29.68
293
Arrogance
41.39%
20.5
293
Entitlement
41.35%
27.29
293
Exploitation
40.9%
29.01
293
Lack of Empathy
35.85%
28.44
293
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Narcissistic Personality Scale (DNPS).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Grandiosity (51.2%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Lack of Empathy (35.9%). The observed difference between dimensions was 15.4 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
293
Countries
45
Collection Start
Jun 11, 2026
Collection End
Oct 10, 2026
Months Recorded
5
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
293
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
293
valid response records.
Approximately
0
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Deenz Narcissistic Personality Scale (DNPS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/narcissistic-personality-test/statistics/