Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Misophonia Test - Do You Have Misophonia?

Research Dataset

Deenz Misophonia Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
STRONG N=312 α=0.962 22Countries
Abstract

Deenz Misophonia Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R) normative dataset currently contains 312 participant records collected between Jun 20, 2026 and Oct 31, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 312 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 43.84 with a standard deviation of 18.24, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.962). Observed skewness (-0.24) and kurtosis (0.24) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

312
Participants
22
Countries
71
Scale Items
0.962
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Misophonia Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R)
Research Status Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity 80 /100 — STRONG
Participants 312
Countries Represented 22
Items 71
Dimensions 7
Data Collection Period Jun 20, 2026 – Oct 31, 2026
Reliability α = 0.962
Note. The current Deenz Misophonia Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R) dataset contains 312 participant records collected from 22 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 43.84%
Median Score 46
Standard Deviation 18.24
Variance 332.69
Standard Error 1.03
95% CI Lower 41.82
95% CI Upper 45.86
Minimum Score 0%
Maximum Score 86%
Observed Range 86
Note. M = 43.84, SD = 18.24, Median = 46. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 41.82 to 45.86.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 312
Countries 22
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 22 countries. The largest contribution originated from IN (47.8% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 22% Very Low
25th 34% Below Average
50th 46% Average
75th 54% Above Average
90th 63% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Misophonia Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 0% to 86% (M = 43.84, SD = 18.24). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.24) and kurtosis (0.24). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.962
Reliability Classification Excellent
Participants 312
Items 71
Standard Error 1.03
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q101 0.7 Excellent Q98 0.7 Excellent Q114 0.68 Excellent Q126 0.68 Excellent Q96 0.67 Excellent Q137 0.67 Excellent Q125 0.66 Excellent Q135 0.66 Excellent Q128 0.65 Excellent Q119 0.65 Excellent Q116 0.65 Excellent Q124 0.65 Excellent Q115 0.65 Excellent Q129 0.64 Excellent Q130 0.64 Excellent Q97 0.64 Excellent Q138 0.64 Excellent Q127 0.64 Excellent Q108 0.63 Excellent Q123 0.62 Excellent Q103 0.62 Excellent Q139 0.62 Excellent Q109 0.62 Excellent Q94 0.61 Excellent Q136 0.61 Excellent Q133 0.59 Excellent Q118 0.59 Excellent Q102 0.58 Excellent Q131 0.58 Excellent Q107 0.58 Excellent Q99 0.56 Excellent Q134 0.56 Excellent Q120 0.56 Excellent Q100 0.56 Excellent Q117 0.55 Excellent Q110 0.55 Excellent Q121 0.53 Excellent Q149 0.52 Excellent Q148 0.51 Excellent Q91 0.51 Excellent Q112 0.5 Excellent Q141 0.5 Excellent Q95 0.5 Acceptable Q111 0.5 Acceptable Q150 0.5 Acceptable Q132 0.49 Acceptable Q147 0.49 Acceptable Q140 0.49 Acceptable Q143 0.49 Acceptable Q144 0.49 Acceptable Q142 0.49 Acceptable Q146 0.49 Acceptable Q151 0.48 Acceptable Q145 0.48 Acceptable Q152 0.47 Acceptable Q93 0.42 Acceptable Q122 0.42 Acceptable Q89 0.41 Acceptable Q92 0.39 Acceptable Q88 0.36 Acceptable Q87 0.35 Acceptable Q106 0.34 Acceptable Q85 0.33 Acceptable Q113 0.32 Acceptable Q105 0.29 Weak Q86 0.25 Weak Q104 0.24 Weak Q90 0.22 Weak Q84 0.12 Problematic Q82 0.02 Problematic Q83 -0.02 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified7 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q82 (r = 0.02)
    I felt angry.
  • Q83 (r = -0.02)
    I felt irritated.
  • Q84 (r = 0.12)
    I felt frustrated.
  • Q86 (r = 0.25)
    I felt disgusted.
  • Q90 (r = 0.22)
    I felt hostile toward the source.
  • Q104 (r = 0.24)
    I could not focus on anything else.
  • Q105 (r = 0.29)
    I needed the sound to stop immediately.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q83 ("I felt irritated."; r = -0.02), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Cognitive Reactions 58.67% 27.16 312
Avoidance Strategies 54.54% 25.09 312
Physiological Reactions 52.79% 26.17 312
Functional Impairment 45.41% 28.15 312
Emotional Reactions 44.48% 29.28 312
Self-Perception 34.12% 35.61 281
Trigger Sensitivity 27.05% 28.98 312
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Misophonia Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Cognitive Reactions (58.7%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Trigger Sensitivity (27.1%). The observed difference between dimensions was 31.6 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 312
Countries 22
Collection Start Jun 20, 2026
Collection End Oct 31, 2026
Months Recorded 5
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 312 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 312 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Deenz Misophonia Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/misophonia-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset