Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Misophonia Test - Do You Have Misophonia?

Research Dataset

Deenz Misophonia Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
STRONG N=289 α=0.964 19Countries
Abstract

Deenz Misophonia Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R) normative dataset currently contains 289 participant records collected between Jun 20, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 289 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 43.9 with a standard deviation of 18.49, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.964). Observed skewness (-0.26) and kurtosis (0.23) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

289
Participants
19
Countries
71
Scale Items
0.964
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Misophonia Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R)
Research Status Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity 75 /100 — STRONG
Participants 289
Countries Represented 19
Items 71
Dimensions 7
Data Collection Period Jun 20, 2026 – Oct 8, 2026
Reliability α = 0.964
Note. The current Deenz Misophonia Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R) dataset contains 289 participant records collected from 19 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 43.9%
Median Score 46
Standard Deviation 18.49
Variance 341.8
Standard Error 1.09
95% CI Lower 41.76
95% CI Upper 46.03
Minimum Score 0%
Maximum Score 86%
Observed Range 86
Note. M = 43.9, SD = 18.49, Median = 46. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 41.76 to 46.03.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 289
Countries 19
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 19 countries. The largest contribution originated from IN (51.6% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 20% Very Low
25th 34% Below Average
50th 46% Average
75th 55% Above Average
90th 66% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Misophonia Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 0% to 86% (M = 43.9, SD = 18.49). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.26) and kurtosis (0.23). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.964
Reliability Classification Excellent
Participants 289
Items 71
Standard Error 1.09
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q98 0.71 Excellent Q101 0.7 Excellent Q114 0.69 Excellent Q137 0.69 Excellent Q126 0.68 Excellent Q96 0.68 Excellent Q125 0.67 Excellent Q119 0.67 Excellent Q124 0.66 Excellent Q127 0.66 Excellent Q138 0.66 Excellent Q128 0.66 Excellent Q135 0.66 Excellent Q115 0.65 Excellent Q116 0.65 Excellent Q129 0.65 Excellent Q97 0.64 Excellent Q123 0.64 Excellent Q130 0.64 Excellent Q103 0.63 Excellent Q108 0.63 Excellent Q136 0.62 Excellent Q109 0.62 Excellent Q139 0.62 Excellent Q133 0.61 Excellent Q94 0.61 Excellent Q118 0.6 Excellent Q131 0.59 Excellent Q102 0.59 Excellent Q99 0.58 Excellent Q107 0.57 Excellent Q117 0.57 Excellent Q120 0.57 Excellent Q110 0.56 Excellent Q134 0.56 Excellent Q100 0.56 Excellent Q121 0.54 Excellent Q149 0.53 Excellent Q148 0.52 Excellent Q141 0.52 Excellent Q132 0.52 Excellent Q150 0.52 Excellent Q91 0.51 Excellent Q147 0.51 Excellent Q140 0.51 Excellent Q112 0.51 Excellent Q143 0.51 Excellent Q144 0.51 Excellent Q142 0.5 Excellent Q146 0.5 Excellent Q95 0.5 Excellent Q111 0.5 Excellent Q151 0.5 Acceptable Q145 0.49 Acceptable Q152 0.49 Acceptable Q93 0.44 Acceptable Q122 0.42 Acceptable Q89 0.42 Acceptable Q92 0.39 Acceptable Q88 0.36 Acceptable Q87 0.35 Acceptable Q106 0.35 Acceptable Q85 0.34 Acceptable Q113 0.32 Acceptable Q105 0.28 Weak Q104 0.24 Weak Q86 0.23 Weak Q90 0.22 Weak Q84 0.13 Problematic Q82 0.01 Problematic Q83 -0.03 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified7 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q82 (r = 0.01)
    I felt angry.
  • Q83 (r = -0.03)
    I felt irritated.
  • Q84 (r = 0.13)
    I felt frustrated.
  • Q86 (r = 0.23)
    I felt disgusted.
  • Q90 (r = 0.22)
    I felt hostile toward the source.
  • Q104 (r = 0.24)
    I could not focus on anything else.
  • Q105 (r = 0.28)
    I needed the sound to stop immediately.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q83 ("I felt irritated."; r = -0.03), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Cognitive Reactions 58.22% 27.62 289
Avoidance Strategies 54.77% 25.44 289
Physiological Reactions 52.01% 26.06 289
Functional Impairment 46.79% 27.69 289
Emotional Reactions 43.06% 29.56 289
Self-Perception 35.77% 35.64 268
Trigger Sensitivity 26.65% 29.61 289
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Misophonia Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Cognitive Reactions (58.2%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Trigger Sensitivity (26.7%). The observed difference between dimensions was 31.6 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 289
Countries 19
Collection Start Jun 20, 2026
Collection End Oct 8, 2026
Months Recorded 5
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 289 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 289 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Deenz Misophonia Questionnaire – Revised (DMQ-R). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/misophonia-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset