Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Manipulative Test - Am I Manipulative Quiz

Research Dataset

Manipulative Personality Self-Assessment (MPSA)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
STRONG N=459 α=0.911 61Countries
Abstract

Manipulative Personality Self-Assessment (MPSA) normative dataset currently contains 459 participant records collected between Jun 11, 2026 and Aug 22, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 459 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 61.37 with a standard deviation of 18.4, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.911). Observed skewness (-0.35) and kurtosis (-0.13) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

459
Participants
61
Countries
20
Scale Items
0.911
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Manipulative Personality Self-Assessment (MPSA)
Research Status Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity 80 /100 — STRONG
Participants 459
Countries Represented 61
Items 20
Dimensions 5
Data Collection Period Jun 11, 2026 – Aug 22, 2026
Reliability α = 0.911
Note. The current Manipulative Personality Self-Assessment (MPSA) dataset contains 459 participant records collected from 61 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 61.37%
Median Score 63
Standard Deviation 18.4
Variance 338.64
Standard Error 0.86
95% CI Lower 59.69
95% CI Upper 63.06
Minimum Score 0%
Maximum Score 95%
Observed Range 95
Note. M = 61.37, SD = 18.4, Median = 63. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 59.69 to 63.06.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 459
Countries 61
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 61 countries. The largest contribution originated from DE (29% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 36% Very Low
25th 48% Below Average
50th 63% Average
75th 74% Above Average
90th 85% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Manipulative Personality Self-Assessment (MPSA) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 0% to 95% (M = 61.37, SD = 18.4). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.35) and kurtosis (-0.13). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.911
Reliability Classification Excellent
Participants 459
Items 20
Standard Error 0.86
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q15 0.72 Excellent Q8 0.72 Excellent Q5 0.71 Excellent Q16 0.7 Excellent Q1 0.67 Excellent Q6 0.66 Excellent Q3 0.65 Excellent Q10 0.64 Excellent Q7 0.62 Excellent Q12 0.59 Excellent Q2 0.57 Excellent Q14 0.55 Excellent Q18 0.49 Acceptable Q13 0.47 Acceptable Q4 0.47 Acceptable Q11 0.46 Acceptable Q17 0.45 Acceptable Q19 0.38 Acceptable Q9 0.34 Acceptable Q20 -0.04 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified1 itemthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q20 (r = -0.04)
    When something goes wrong, I can usually explain why my actions made sense at the time.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q20 ("When something goes wrong, I can usually explain why my actions made sense at the time."; r = -0.04), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Deceptive 70.94% 21.83 459
Calculative 70.23% 21.98 459
Amoral 63.32% 24.88 459
Exploitative 57.28% 27.39 459
Self-Justifying 45.35% 16.99 459
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Manipulative Personality Self-Assessment (MPSA).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Deceptive (70.9%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Self-Justifying (45.4%). The observed difference between dimensions was 25.6 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 459
Countries 61
Collection Start Jun 11, 2026
Collection End Aug 22, 2026
Months Recorded 3
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 459 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 459 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Manipulative Personality Self-Assessment (MPSA). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/manipulative-quiz/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset

PDF