MAIA Test – Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-2)

Research Dataset

Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness – Version 2 (MAIA-2)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
PRELIMINARY N=5 α=0 5Countries

Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness – Version 2 (MAIA-2) normative dataset currently contains 5 participant records collected between Jul 4, 2026 and Jul 15, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 5 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 48.6 with a standard deviation of 15.19, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis produced a Cronbach alpha of 0, which falls below commonly accepted psychometric standards and should be interpreted cautiously until additional data are collected. Observed skewness (-0.49) and kurtosis (1.47) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

5
Participants
5
Countries
37
Scale Items
0
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness – Version 2 (MAIA-2)
Research Status Preliminary Dataset
Dataset Maturity 10 /100 — PRELIMINARY
Participants 5
Countries Represented 5
Items 37
Dimensions 8
Data Collection Period Jul 4, 2026 – Jul 15, 2026
Reliability α = 0
Note. The current Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness – Version 2 (MAIA-2) dataset contains 5 participant records collected from 5 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.

Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 48.6%
Median Score 49
Standard Deviation 15.19
Variance 230.8
Standard Error 6.79
95% CI Lower 35.28
95% CI Upper 61.92
Minimum Score 26%
Maximum Score 68%
Observed Range 42
Note. M = 48.6, SD = 15.19, Median = 49. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 35.28 to 61.92.

Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 5
Countries 5
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.

Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 5 countries. The largest contribution originated from BR (20% of available geographic records).

Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 26% Very Low
25th 46% Below Average
50th 49% Average
75th 54% Above Average
90th 54% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness – Version 2 (MAIA-2) sample.

Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 26% to 68% (M = 48.6, SD = 15.19). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.49) and kurtosis (1.47). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.

Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0
Reliability Classification Unacceptable
Participants 5
Items 37
Standard Error 6.79
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.

Item–Total Correlations
Insufficient Sample Size

Item–total correlations are not currently reported because the assessment has fewer than 100 participant responses. Psychometric item analysis requires a larger sample to produce stable and interpretable estimates.

Current Participants: 5
Minimum Recommended: 100

Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Attention Regulation 67.2% 25.89 5
Noticing 59% 40.68 5
Emotional Awareness 57.6% 36.18 5
Self-Regulation 51% 34.35 5
Not-Worrying 43.2% 8.67 5
Body Listening 37.4% 27.82 5
Trusting 34.6% 24.39 5
Not-Distracting 27% 25.1 5
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness – Version 2 (MAIA-2).

Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Attention Regulation (67.2%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Not-Distracting (27%). The observed difference between dimensions was 40.2 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.

Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 5
Countries 5
Collection Start Jul 4, 2026
Collection End Jul 15, 2026
Months Recorded 1
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 5 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 5 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.


Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.


Recommended Citation

Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness – Version 2 (MAIA-2). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/maia-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset