Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Kinsey Scale Test

Research Dataset

Kinsey-Style Continuum Scale

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
STRONG N=745 α=0.712 58Countries
Abstract

Kinsey-Style Continuum Scale normative dataset currently contains 745 participant records collected between Jun 9, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 745 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 56.08 with a standard deviation of 12.42, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.712). Observed skewness (-0.65) and kurtosis (1.46) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

745
Participants
58
Countries
20
Scale Items
0.712
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Kinsey-Style Continuum Scale
Research Status Robust Dataset
Dataset Maturity 80 /100 — STRONG
Participants 745
Countries Represented 58
Items 20
Dimensions 11
Data Collection Period Jun 9, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026
Reliability α = 0.712
Note. The current Kinsey-Style Continuum Scale dataset contains 745 participant records collected from 58 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 56.08%
Median Score 56
Standard Deviation 12.42
Variance 154.16
Standard Error 0.45
95% CI Lower 55.18
95% CI Upper 56.97
Minimum Score 0%
Maximum Score 93%
Observed Range 93
Note. M = 56.08, SD = 12.42, Median = 56. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 55.18 to 56.97.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 745
Countries 58
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 58 countries. The largest contribution originated from DE (27.1% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 40% Very Low
25th 49% Below Average
50th 56% Average
75th 64% Above Average
90th 71% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Kinsey-Style Continuum Scale sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 0% to 93% (M = 56.08, SD = 12.42). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.65) and kurtosis (1.46). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.712
Reliability Classification Acceptable
Participants 745
Items 20
Standard Error 0.45
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q18 0.53 Excellent Q11 0.52 Excellent Q17 0.51 Excellent Q12 0.5 Excellent Q3 0.46 Acceptable Q7 0.43 Acceptable Q13 0.42 Acceptable Q5 0.38 Acceptable Q9 0.33 Acceptable Q1 0.33 Acceptable Q16 0.27 Weak Q15 0.21 Weak Q6 0.19 Problematic Q2 0.17 Problematic Q4 0.14 Problematic Q19 0.1 Problematic Q10 0.08 Problematic Q8 0.06 Problematic Q14 -0.06 Problematic Q20 -0.11 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified10 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q2 (r = 0.17)
    I often develop romantic feelings toward people of the opposite sex.
  • Q4 (r = 0.14)
    I experience physical attraction toward people of the opposite sex.
  • Q6 (r = 0.19)
    I can imagine myself in a long-term relationship with someone of the opposite sex.
  • Q8 (r = 0.06)
    My fantasies frequently involve people of the opposite sex.
  • Q10 (r = 0.08)
    I feel emotionally closer to people of the opposite sex.
  • Q14 (r = -0.06)
    I rarely experience strong physical attraction toward anyone.
  • Q15 (r = 0.21)
    Emotional connection is more important to me than physical attraction.
  • Q16 (r = 0.27)
    I feel uncertain about how to define my orientation.
  • Q19 (r = 0.1)
    I feel comfortable discussing my attraction patterns openly.
  • Q20 (r = -0.11)
    I feel stress or confusion related to my attraction patterns.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q20 ("I feel stress or confusion related to my attraction patterns."; r = -0.11), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Orientation Exploration 65.66% 25.85 745
Opposite-Sex Attraction 65.05% 31.05 745
Fantasy Patterns 64.31% 20.51 745
Orientation Fluidity 64.07% 26.4 745
Relationship Orientation 60.83% 20.54 745
Emotional Bonding 59.68% 24.9 745
Self-Acceptance 55.46% 31.27 736
Same-Sex Attraction 54.52% 32.23 745
Emotional Orientation 51.5% 30.1 736
Asexual Traits 43.65% 33.68 736
Identity Conflict 35.42% 35.75 736
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Kinsey-Style Continuum Scale.
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Orientation Exploration (65.7%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Identity Conflict (35.4%). The observed difference between dimensions was 30.2 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 745
Countries 58
Collection Start Jun 9, 2026
Collection End Nov 3, 2026
Months Recorded 6
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 745 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 745 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Kinsey-Style Continuum Scale. Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/kinsey-scale-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset

PDF