Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Gender Role Test

Research Dataset

Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
ROBUST N=1519 α=0.777 92Countries
Abstract

Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24) normative dataset currently contains 1519 participant records collected between Jun 7, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 1519 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 57.43 with a standard deviation of 12.04, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.777). Observed skewness (-0.55) and kurtosis (2.64) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

1519
Participants
92
Countries
24
Scale Items
0.777
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24)
Research Status Robust Dataset
Dataset Maturity 90 /100 — ROBUST
Participants 1519
Countries Represented 92
Items 24
Dimensions 2
Data Collection Period Jun 7, 2026 – Sep 21, 2026
Reliability α = 0.777
Note. The current Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24) dataset contains 1519 participant records collected from 92 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 57.43%
Median Score 57
Standard Deviation 12.04
Variance 144.94
Standard Error 0.31
95% CI Lower 56.82
95% CI Upper 58.03
Minimum Score 0%
Maximum Score 96%
Observed Range 96
Note. M = 57.43, SD = 12.04, Median = 57. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 56.82 to 58.03.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 1519
Countries 92
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 92 countries. The largest contribution originated from US (24.3% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 44% Very Low
25th 50% Below Average
50th 57% Average
75th 65% Above Average
90th 72% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 0% to 96% (M = 57.43, SD = 12.04). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.55) and kurtosis (2.64). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.777
Reliability Classification Acceptable
Participants 1519
Items 24
Standard Error 0.31
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q13 0.48 Acceptable Q15 0.47 Acceptable Q12 0.43 Acceptable Q4 0.41 Acceptable Q5 0.4 Acceptable Q10 0.39 Acceptable Q21 0.36 Acceptable Q22 0.35 Acceptable Q1 0.34 Acceptable Q9 0.33 Acceptable Q6 0.33 Acceptable Q11 0.33 Acceptable Q16 0.32 Acceptable Q7 0.32 Acceptable Q2 0.3 Weak Q20 0.3 Weak Q3 0.3 Weak Q18 0.29 Weak Q17 0.24 Weak Q19 0.23 Weak Q23 0.22 Weak Q8 0.21 Weak Q14 0.18 Problematic Q24 0.01 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified10 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q2 (r = 0.3)
    I prefer to solve problems on my own.
  • Q3 (r = 0.3)
    I enjoy taking risks.
  • Q8 (r = 0.21)
    I prefer not to show vulnerability.
  • Q14 (r = 0.18)
    I prefer to keep my emotions private.
  • Q17 (r = 0.24)
    I enjoy activities that involve teamwork.
  • Q18 (r = 0.29)
    I feel a sense of fulfillment in nurturing roles.
  • Q19 (r = 0.23)
    I prioritize the needs of others over my own.
  • Q20 (r = 0.3)
    I find satisfaction in being a caregiver.
  • Q23 (r = 0.22)
    I sometimes feel the need to downplay my strengths to fit in.
  • Q24 (r = 0.01)
    I worry about being perceived as too emotional in the workplace.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q24 ("I worry about being perceived as too emotional in the workplace."; r = 0.01), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Feminine 57.86% 15.49 1514
Masculine 57.36% 17.09 1515
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Feminine (57.9%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Masculine (57.4%). The observed difference between dimensions was 0.5 percentage points. Dimension scores were broadly similar across the current normative sample.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 1519
Countries 92
Collection Start Jun 7, 2026
Collection End Sep 21, 2026
Months Recorded 4
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 1519 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 1515 valid response records. Approximately 4 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/gender-role-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset

PDF