Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24)
normative dataset currently contains
1132
participant records collected between
Jun 7, 2026
and
Aug 1, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 1132 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 56.98 with a standard deviation of 12.37, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.789). Observed skewness (-0.65) and kurtosis (2.82) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
1132
Participants
83
Countries
24
Scale Items
0.789
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24)
Research Status
Robust Dataset
Dataset Maturity
90
/100 —
ROBUST
Participants
1132
Countries Represented
83
Items
24
Dimensions
2
Data Collection Period
Jun 7, 2026
–
Aug 1, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.789
Note.
The current Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24) dataset contains 1132 participant records collected from 83 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
56.98%
Median Score
57
Standard Deviation
12.37
Variance
153.13
Standard Error
0.37
95% CI Lower
56.26
95% CI Upper
57.7
Minimum Score
0%
Maximum Score
96%
Observed Range
96
Note.
M = 56.98, SD = 12.37, Median = 57. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 56.26 to 57.7.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
1132
Countries
83
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
18-24
238
under18
227
prefer_not
124
25-34
58
35-44
23
55plus
18
45-54
14
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Male
386
Female
195
Prefer_not
121
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 83 countries. The largest contribution originated from US (22.6% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
US
256
22.6%
IN
155
13.7%
DE
93
8.2%
FR
88
7.8%
PH
71
6.3%
ID
47
4.2%
GB
37
3.3%
BR
34
3%
MX
27
2.4%
AU
23
2%
ES
23
2%
NL
19
1.7%
PL
19
1.7%
CA
14
1.2%
CH
13
1.1%
CL
12
1.1%
IT
9
0.8%
CO
8
0.7%
NO
8
0.7%
AR
8
0.7%
PT
7
0.6%
DK
7
0.6%
EE
6
0.5%
TR
6
0.5%
AT
6
0.5%
UA
6
0.5%
GE
5
0.4%
IR
5
0.4%
TH
5
0.4%
EG
5
0.4%
AE
5
0.4%
CR
5
0.4%
IE
4
0.4%
RU
4
0.4%
VN
4
0.4%
CZ
4
0.4%
MA
4
0.4%
BG
4
0.4%
IQ
4
0.4%
RS
3
0.3%
SK
3
0.3%
FI
3
0.3%
SG
3
0.3%
T1
3
0.3%
HU
3
0.3%
MY
3
0.3%
KW
2
0.2%
SY
2
0.2%
SE
2
0.2%
IL
2
0.2%
HK
2
0.2%
PY
2
0.2%
VE
2
0.2%
KZ
2
0.2%
UG
2
0.2%
TT
2
0.2%
KH
2
0.2%
TJ
2
0.2%
ZA
2
0.2%
PR
2
0.2%
JP
1
0.1%
PK
1
0.1%
AM
1
0.1%
HR
1
0.1%
BD
1
0.1%
MM
1
0.1%
NG
1
0.1%
BH
1
0.1%
BN
1
0.1%
GD
1
0.1%
DO
1
0.1%
LK
1
0.1%
NP
1
0.1%
GH
1
0.1%
NC
1
0.1%
BO
1
0.1%
EC
1
0.1%
MN
1
0.1%
LY
1
0.1%
RO
1
0.1%
SA
1
0.1%
BE
1
0.1%
SV
1
0.1%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
43%
Very Low
25th
50%
Below Average
50th
57%
Average
75th
65%
Above Average
90th
72%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 0% to 96% (M = 56.98, SD = 12.37). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.65) and kurtosis (2.82).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.789
Reliability Classification
Acceptable
Participants
1132
Items
24
Standard Error
0.37
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
The analysis identified7
itemsthat may benefit from future review.
Items Recommended for Future Review
Q3
(r = 0.27)
I enjoy taking risks.
Q8
(r = 0.21)
I prefer not to show vulnerability.
Q14
(r = 0.19)
I prefer to keep my emotions private.
Q17
(r = 0.24)
I enjoy activities that involve teamwork.
Q19
(r = 0.23)
I prioritize the needs of others over my own.
Q23
(r = 0.25)
I sometimes feel the need to downplay my strengths to fit in.
Q24
(r = 0.01)
I worry about being perceived as too emotional in the workplace.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q24 ("I worry about being perceived as too emotional in the workplace."; r = 0.01), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Feminine
57.52%
15.65
1127
Masculine
56.91%
17.03
1128
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Feminine (57.5%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Masculine (56.9%). The observed difference between dimensions was 0.6 percentage points. Dimension scores were broadly similar across the current normative sample.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
1132
Countries
83
Collection Start
Jun 7, 2026
Collection End
Aug 1, 2026
Months Recorded
3
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
1132
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
1128
valid response records.
Approximately
4
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/gender-role-test/statistics/