Ψ Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool
☰
🏠 Main Page 📝 Questionnaire

Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24) Research Statistics

Assessment Information
  • Sample Adequacy: Established dataset with reasonably stable norms.
  • Research Status: ESTABLISHED DATASET
  • Items: 24
  • Dimensions: 2
  • Dataset Maturity: The current dataset achieved a maturity score of 60/100 and is classified as DEVELOPING.

Table 1
Normative Dataset Overview
Descriptive characteristics of the current normative sample.
Participants 198
Countries Represented 19
Dataset Maturity 60/100 — DevelopingDataset
Research Status ESTABLISHED NORMATIVE DATASET
Sample Adequacy Established dataset with reasonably stable norms.
Data Collection Period Jun 7, 2026 – Jun 15, 2026
The current normative dataset consists of198 participants collected from19 countries.
Table 2
Score Statistics
Measures of central tendency and variability.
Mean Score 51.47%
Median Score 50
Standard Deviation 15.61
Variance 243.67
Standard Error (SEM) 1.11
Reliability (α) 0.885
Items 24
Dimensions 2
The sample demonstrated a mean score of51.47% (Mdn = 50, SD = 15.61).
Table 3
Distribution Characteristics
Distribution shape and score dispersion indicators.
Observed Score Range 94
Maximum Observed Score 94%
Minimum Observed Score 0%
95% Confidence Interval 49.3– 53.64
Skewness -0.57
Kurtosis 2.04
Observed skewness(-0.57) and kurtosis(2.04) provide indicators of distribution quality and normality.
Global Participation Chart Participants IN 112 #1 US 20 #2 BR 10 #3 DE 9 #4 PL 8 #5 ID 7 #6 ES 5 #7 NL 4 #8 TR 4 #9 GB 3 #10 FR 3 #11 T1 2 #12 CL 2 #13 EG 2 #14 CA 2 #15 GE 2 #16 MM 1 #17 AT 1 #18 UA 1 #19
Global Participation Interpretation

The current dataset includes responses from 19countries. The largest contribution currently comes from IN which represents approximately 56.6% of all participants. International participation enhances sample diversity and improves the generalizability of normative findings across geographic regions.

Normative Percentile Distribution

Population Median 10th Percentile 33 Population Median 25th Percentile 45 Population Median 50th Percentile 50 Population Median 75th Percentile 60 Population Median 90th Percentile 69
Normative Interpretation

The current normative dataset indicates that approximately 10% of participants scored below33%, while 90% scored above this level.The median score was50%, meaning that half of participants scored below this value and half scored above it. Scores of60% or greater were achieved by approximately the highest 25% of participants, whereas scores of69% or greater were achieved by approximately the highest 10% of participants. These percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks that can be used to contextualize individual assessment results relative to the current community sample.

Distribution Histogram

0-9 5 10-19 3 20-29 1 30-39 20 40-49 56 50-59 56 60-69 37 70-79 15 80-89 2 90-99 3
Distribution Interpretation

This histogram displays the distribution of participant scores across the assessment. A balanced bell-shaped pattern generally indicates good score dispersion and stronger normative utility, whereas highly skewed distributions may indicate floor effects, ceiling effects, or sample bias.

Distribution Quality

The score distribution demonstrateda skewness of -0.57 and a kurtosis of 2.04.

The score distribution appears reasonably balanced and does not currently suggest substantial departures from normality.

Reliability Analysis

0.885 Poor Acceptable Good Excellent

GOOD RELIABILITY

The assessment demonstrated good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.885), suggesting that the assessment items measure a relatively coherent psychological construct.

Item–Total Correlations

Item Item Quality r Rating Q30 0.94 Excellent Q31 0.94 Excellent Q49 0.92 Excellent Q37 0.9 Excellent Q38 0.73 Excellent Q32 0.68 Excellent Q41 0.68 Excellent Q29 0.67 Excellent Q42 0.67 Excellent Q16 0.56 Excellent Q13 0.55 Excellent Q15 0.55 Excellent Q21 0.53 Excellent Q12 0.53 Excellent Q18 0.52 Excellent Q20 0.48 Acceptable Q22 0.46 Acceptable Q23 0.45 Acceptable Q14 0.4 Acceptable Q5 0.39 Acceptable Q4 0.39 Acceptable Q17 0.38 Acceptable Q46 0.37 Acceptable Q2 0.36 Acceptable Q6 0.35 Acceptable Q19 0.32 Acceptable Q10 0.32 Acceptable Q33 0.32 Acceptable Q9 0.31 Acceptable Q1 0.31 Acceptable Q36 0.29 Weak Q7 0.24 Weak Q3 0.24 Weak Q11 0.24 Weak Q8 0.22 Weak Q45 0.21 Weak Q27 0.2 Weak Q40 0.16 Problematic Q47 0.16 Problematic Q48 0.16 Problematic Q24 0.07 Problematic Q44 0.05 Problematic Q34 0 Problematic Q35 0 Problematic Q39 -0.11 Problematic Q26 -0.23 Problematic Q28 -0.23 Problematic Q25 -0.78 Problematic Q43 -0.78 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified19 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q3 (r = 0.24)
    I enjoy taking risks.
  • Q7 (r = 0.24)
    I prefer activities that involve competition.
  • Q8 (r = 0.22)
    I prefer not to show vulnerability.
  • Q11 (r = 0.24)
    I prefer to lead rather than follow in group activities.
  • Q24 (r = 0.07)
    I worry about being perceived as too emotional in the workplace.
  • Q25 (r = -0.78)
  • Q26 (r = -0.23)
  • Q27 (r = 0.2)
  • Q28 (r = -0.23)
  • Q34 (r = 0)
  • Q35 (r = 0)
  • Q36 (r = 0.29)
  • Q39 (r = -0.11)
  • Q40 (r = 0.16)
  • Q43 (r = -0.78)
  • Q44 (r = 0.05)
  • Q45 (r = 0.21)
  • Q47 (r = 0.16)
  • Q48 (r = 0.16)

Lower item–total correlations may indicate weaker alignment with the overall construct, greater response variability, or the need for further refinement. These findings should be interpreted cautiously and considered alongside additional psychometric evidence as the normative sample grows.

Dimension Norms

Dimension Profile Mean SD 50% Feminine 59% 18.1 Masculine 52.5% 17
Dimension Interpretation

The highest scoring dimension in the current sample was Feminine (59%). The lowest scoring dimension was Masculine (52.5%). Dimensions located above the 50% reference line represent characteristics that were more strongly endorsed within the current participant sample. Standard deviations indicate the degree of variability observed across participant responses.

Normative Dataset Growth 198 Jun 2026
Dataset Growth Interpretation

The current normative dataset contains 198 participants . The cumulative growth curve illustrates how the participant sample has expanded over time. Increasing sample sizes generally improve the stability of percentile norms, reliability estimates, and other psychometric statistics.

Normative Data Notice

A total of 198 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 126 valid response records. Approximately 72 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns, historical data inconsistencies, or automated data-quality screening procedures.

Research Interpretation

This psychometric dataset currently includes 198 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 51.47 with a standard deviation of 15.61, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.885). Observed skewness (-0.57) and kurtosis (2.04) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

Ethical & Research Notice

All responses included in this dataset are collected anonymously through voluntary participation. No personally identifying information is stored. Results are intended exclusively for educational, psychometric, research, and self-reflective purposes and should not be used as clinical diagnoses. Drdeenz continuously monitors response quality, distribution stability, and internal consistency to support ethical psychometric reporting.

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset

Research Citation

Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24). Drdeenz Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/gender-role-test/statistics/

License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

← Questionnaire Page 🏠 Main Test Page