Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24)
normative dataset currently contains
1288
participant records collected between
Jun 7, 2026
and
Aug 19, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 1288 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 57.18 with a standard deviation of 12.2, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.782). Observed skewness (-0.57) and kurtosis (2.76) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
1288
Participants
87
Countries
24
Scale Items
0.782
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24)
Research Status
Robust Dataset
Dataset Maturity
90
/100 —
ROBUST
Participants
1288
Countries Represented
87
Items
24
Dimensions
2
Data Collection Period
Jun 7, 2026
–
Aug 19, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.782
Note.
The current Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24) dataset contains 1288 participant records collected from 87 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
57.18%
Median Score
57
Standard Deviation
12.2
Variance
148.9
Standard Error
0.34
95% CI Lower
56.52
95% CI Upper
57.85
Minimum Score
0%
Maximum Score
96%
Observed Range
96
Note.
M = 57.18, SD = 12.2, Median = 57. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 56.52 to 57.85.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
1288
Countries
87
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
18-24
299
under18
281
prefer_not
137
25-34
77
35-44
25
55plus
22
45-54
17
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Male
466
Female
238
Prefer_not
154
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 87 countries. The largest contribution originated from US (23% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
US
296
23%
IN
157
12.2%
DE
119
9.2%
FR
104
8.1%
PH
71
5.5%
ID
54
4.2%
GB
45
3.5%
BR
36
2.8%
MX
27
2.1%
NL
27
2.1%
ES
24
1.9%
AU
24
1.9%
PL
21
1.6%
CA
15
1.2%
CH
14
1.1%
CL
12
0.9%
IT
11
0.9%
UA
10
0.8%
PT
10
0.8%
TR
10
0.8%
AT
10
0.8%
NO
9
0.7%
CO
8
0.6%
RU
8
0.6%
AR
8
0.6%
EE
7
0.5%
DK
7
0.5%
EG
7
0.5%
CR
5
0.4%
GE
5
0.4%
IR
5
0.4%
FI
5
0.4%
TH
5
0.4%
CZ
5
0.4%
AE
5
0.4%
IQ
4
0.3%
BG
4
0.3%
IE
4
0.3%
SE
4
0.3%
VN
4
0.3%
HU
4
0.3%
KZ
4
0.3%
MA
4
0.3%
RS
3
0.2%
SK
3
0.2%
T1
3
0.2%
SG
3
0.2%
BY
3
0.2%
MY
3
0.2%
PR
2
0.2%
KW
2
0.2%
JP
2
0.2%
SY
2
0.2%
IL
2
0.2%
HK
2
0.2%
PY
2
0.2%
VE
2
0.2%
KH
2
0.2%
UG
2
0.2%
TT
2
0.2%
TJ
2
0.2%
ZA
2
0.2%
LT
2
0.2%
RO
1
0.1%
SA
1
0.1%
BE
1
0.1%
SV
1
0.1%
PK
1
0.1%
AM
1
0.1%
UY
1
0.1%
MM
1
0.1%
HR
1
0.1%
BD
1
0.1%
PE
1
0.1%
NG
1
0.1%
BH
1
0.1%
BN
1
0.1%
GD
1
0.1%
DO
1
0.1%
LK
1
0.1%
NP
1
0.1%
GH
1
0.1%
NC
1
0.1%
BO
1
0.1%
EC
1
0.1%
MN
1
0.1%
LY
1
0.1%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
44%
Very Low
25th
50%
Below Average
50th
57%
Average
75th
65%
Above Average
90th
72%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 0% to 96% (M = 57.18, SD = 12.2). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.57) and kurtosis (2.76).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.782
Reliability Classification
Acceptable
Participants
1288
Items
24
Standard Error
0.34
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
The analysis identified7
itemsthat may benefit from future review.
Items Recommended for Future Review
Q3
(r = 0.27)
I enjoy taking risks.
Q8
(r = 0.21)
I prefer not to show vulnerability.
Q14
(r = 0.19)
I prefer to keep my emotions private.
Q17
(r = 0.23)
I enjoy activities that involve teamwork.
Q19
(r = 0.23)
I prioritize the needs of others over my own.
Q23
(r = 0.23)
I sometimes feel the need to downplay my strengths to fit in.
Q24
(r = 0.01)
I worry about being perceived as too emotional in the workplace.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q24 ("I worry about being perceived as too emotional in the workplace."; r = 0.01), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Feminine
57.57%
15.53
1283
Masculine
57.21%
17.01
1284
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Feminine (57.6%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Masculine (57.2%). The observed difference between dimensions was 0.4 percentage points. Dimension scores were broadly similar across the current normative sample.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
1288
Countries
87
Collection Start
Jun 7, 2026
Collection End
Aug 19, 2026
Months Recorded
3
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
1288
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
1284
valid response records.
Approximately
4
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/gender-role-test/statistics/