Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Gender Role Test

Research Dataset

Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
ROBUST N=2166 α=0.831 100Countries
Abstract

Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24) normative dataset currently contains 2166 participant records collected between Jun 7, 2026 and Nov 1, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 2166 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 58.69 with a standard deviation of 13.38, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.831). Observed skewness (0.15) and kurtosis (2.9) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

2166
Participants
100
Countries
24
Scale Items
0.831
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24)
Research Status Robust Dataset
Dataset Maturity 95 /100 — ROBUST
Participants 2166
Countries Represented 100
Items 24
Dimensions 2
Data Collection Period Jun 7, 2026 – Nov 1, 2026
Reliability α = 0.831
Note. The current Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24) dataset contains 2166 participant records collected from 100 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 58.69%
Median Score 58
Standard Deviation 13.38
Variance 178.91
Standard Error 0.29
95% CI Lower 58.13
95% CI Upper 59.26
Minimum Score 0%
Maximum Score 100%
Observed Range 100
Note. M = 58.69, SD = 13.38, Median = 58. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 58.13 to 59.26.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 2166
Countries 100
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 100 countries. The largest contribution originated from US (23.1% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 45% Very Low
25th 51% Below Average
50th 58% Average
75th 66% Above Average
90th 73% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 0% to 100% (M = 58.69, SD = 13.38). Distribution characteristics included skewness (0.15) and kurtosis (2.9). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.831
Reliability Classification Good
Participants 2166
Items 24
Standard Error 0.29
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q13 0.5 Excellent Q15 0.49 Acceptable Q4 0.46 Acceptable Q5 0.44 Acceptable Q12 0.43 Acceptable Q11 0.41 Acceptable Q10 0.41 Acceptable Q24 0.41 Acceptable Q7 0.41 Acceptable Q1 0.41 Acceptable Q3 0.4 Acceptable Q9 0.39 Acceptable Q21 0.38 Acceptable Q20 0.37 Acceptable Q22 0.37 Acceptable Q18 0.36 Acceptable Q16 0.36 Acceptable Q6 0.34 Acceptable Q17 0.32 Acceptable Q2 0.32 Acceptable Q19 0.31 Acceptable Q8 0.29 Weak Q23 0.29 Weak Q14 0.23 Weak
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified3 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q8 (r = 0.29)
    I prefer not to show vulnerability.
  • Q14 (r = 0.23)
    I prefer to keep my emotions private.
  • Q23 (r = 0.29)
    I sometimes feel the need to downplay my strengths to fit in.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q14 ("I prefer to keep my emotions private."; r = 0.23), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Feminine 58.96% 16.57 2161
Masculine 58.7% 17.87 2162
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Feminine (59%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Masculine (58.7%). The observed difference between dimensions was 0.3 percentage points. Dimension scores were broadly similar across the current normative sample.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 2166
Countries 100
Collection Start Jun 7, 2026
Collection End Nov 1, 2026
Months Recorded 6
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 2166 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 2162 valid response records. Approximately 4 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Deenz Gender Role Scale (DGRS-24). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/gender-role-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset

PDF