Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Gender Dysphoria Test

Research Dataset

Deenz Gender Dysphoria Scale (DGDS)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
STRONG N=1483 α=0.63 72Countries
Abstract

Deenz Gender Dysphoria Scale (DGDS) normative dataset currently contains 1483 participant records collected between Jun 11, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 1483 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 50.81 with a standard deviation of 10.06, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis produced a Cronbach alpha of 0.63, which falls below commonly accepted psychometric standards and should be interpreted cautiously until additional data are collected. Observed skewness (-0.47) and kurtosis (0.87) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

1483
Participants
72
Countries
25
Scale Items
0.63
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Gender Dysphoria Scale (DGDS)
Research Status Robust Dataset
Dataset Maturity 80 /100 — STRONG
Participants 1483
Countries Represented 72
Items 25
Dimensions 5
Data Collection Period Jun 11, 2026 – Oct 8, 2026
Reliability α = 0.63
Note. The current Deenz Gender Dysphoria Scale (DGDS) dataset contains 1483 participant records collected from 72 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 50.81%
Median Score 51
Standard Deviation 10.06
Variance 101.17
Standard Error 0.26
95% CI Lower 50.3
95% CI Upper 51.32
Minimum Score 5%
Maximum Score 83%
Observed Range 78
Note. M = 50.81, SD = 10.06, Median = 51. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 50.3 to 51.32.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 1483
Countries 72
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 72 countries. The largest contribution originated from DE (13.9% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 38% Very Low
25th 45% Below Average
50th 51% Average
75th 58% Above Average
90th 63% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Gender Dysphoria Scale (DGDS) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 5% to 83% (M = 50.81, SD = 10.06). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.47) and kurtosis (0.87). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.63
Reliability Classification Questionable
Participants 1483
Items 25
Standard Error 0.26
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q5 0.33 Acceptable Q9 0.33 Acceptable Q11 0.31 Acceptable Q7 0.27 Weak Q17 0.27 Weak Q22 0.26 Weak Q12 0.26 Weak Q6 0.26 Weak Q13 0.25 Weak Q3 0.25 Weak Q15 0.24 Weak Q21 0.24 Weak Q20 0.23 Weak Q10 0.21 Weak Q14 0.19 Problematic Q16 0.19 Problematic Q2 0.18 Problematic Q23 0.17 Problematic Q4 0.17 Problematic Q19 0.16 Problematic Q25 0.12 Problematic Q1 0.12 Problematic Q24 0.05 Problematic Q18 0.04 Problematic Q8 0.02 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified22 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q1 (r = 0.12)
    Sometimes I wish my body looked different.
  • Q2 (r = 0.18)
    I feel happy with the way I look.
  • Q3 (r = 0.25)
    I like trying clothes or hairstyles that feel fun to me.
  • Q4 (r = 0.17)
    I feel okay in the clothes I usually wear.
  • Q6 (r = 0.26)
    I like dressing in ways that show who I am.
  • Q7 (r = 0.27)
    I enjoy mixing different styles or accessories.
  • Q8 (r = 0.02)
    I usually wear what people expect me to wear.
  • Q10 (r = 0.21)
    I feel fine with the way I usually dress.
  • Q12 (r = 0.26)
    I feel comfortable with friends who are different from me.
  • Q13 (r = 0.25)
    Sometimes I enjoy activities with people of a different gender than me.
  • Q14 (r = 0.19)
    I don’t worry about whether games or activities are for boys or girls.
  • Q15 (r = 0.24)
    I feel happy when I talk or play with friends.
  • Q16 (r = 0.19)
    Sometimes I dream about being someone else.
  • Q17 (r = 0.27)
    I feel good being myself.
  • Q18 (r = 0.04)
    If someone calls me by a different name or pronoun, it feels strange.
  • Q19 (r = 0.16)
    I feel fine being called by my usual name or pronoun.
  • Q20 (r = 0.23)
    I sometimes imagine myself in a different role or character.
  • Q21 (r = 0.24)
    Sometimes I feel different from others around me.
  • Q22 (r = 0.26)
    I feel proud of who I am.
  • Q23 (r = 0.17)
    I sometimes feel unsure about what I like or enjoy.
  • Q24 (r = 0.05)
    I feel happy when people listen to me or are kind.
  • Q25 (r = 0.12)
    I feel sad when people don’t understand me.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q8 ("I usually wear what people expect me to wear."; r = 0.02), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Body Feelings 70.95% 23.31 1483
Emotional Discomfort 62.83% 16.13 1483
Expression Preference 48.05% 12.25 1483
Identity & Self-Acceptance 46.45% 19.95 1483
Social Alignment 39.86% 15.28 1483
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Gender Dysphoria Scale (DGDS).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Body Feelings (71%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Social Alignment (39.9%). The observed difference between dimensions was 31.1 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 1483
Countries 72
Collection Start Jun 11, 2026
Collection End Oct 8, 2026
Months Recorded 5
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 1483 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 1483 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Deenz Gender Dysphoria Scale (DGDS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/gender-dysphoria-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset

PDF