Codependency Test – Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale
Research Dataset
Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale
Normative and Psychometric Statistics
STRONG
N=150
α=0.958
10Countries
Abstract
Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale
normative dataset currently contains
150
participant records collected between
Jun 9, 2026
and
Jul 25, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 150 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 32.44 with a standard deviation of 27.5, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.958). Observed skewness (0.26) and kurtosis (-0.84) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
150
Participants
10
Countries
24
Scale Items
0.958
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale
Research Status
Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity
65
/100 —
STRONG
Participants
150
Countries Represented
10
Items
24
Dimensions
4
Data Collection Period
Jun 9, 2026
–
Jul 25, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.958
Note.
The current Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale dataset contains 150 participant records collected from 10 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
32.44%
Median Score
38
Standard Deviation
27.5
Variance
756.15
Standard Error
2.25
95% CI Lower
28.04
95% CI Upper
36.84
Minimum Score
0%
Maximum Score
100%
Observed Range
100
Note.
M = 32.44, SD = 27.5, Median = 38. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 28.04 to 36.84.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
150
Countries
10
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
prefer_not
28
25-34
6
18-24
5
35-44
5
55plus
4
under18
3
45-54
3
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Male
35
Female
16
Prefer_not
3
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 10 countries. The largest contribution originated from IN (59.3% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
IN
89
59.3%
US
37
24.7%
BR
11
7.3%
DE
6
4%
GB
2
1.3%
CA
1
0.7%
AU
1
0.7%
PH
1
0.7%
KZ
1
0.7%
KR
1
0.7%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
0%
Very Low
25th
0%
Below Average
50th
38%
Average
75th
49%
Above Average
90th
71%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 0% to 100% (M = 32.44, SD = 27.5). Distribution characteristics included skewness (0.26) and kurtosis (-0.84).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.958
Reliability Classification
Excellent
Participants
150
Items
24
Standard Error
2.25
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
All items demonstrated acceptable or stronger discrimination. No item-level psychometric concerns were identified within the current dataset.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Self-Sacrifice
33.48%
27.93
150
Approval Dependence
32.83%
29.63
150
Relationship Enmeshment
30.47%
28.32
134
Boundary Difficulties
26.08%
25.32
134
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale.
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Self-Sacrifice (33.5%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Boundary Difficulties (26.1%). The observed difference between dimensions was 7.4 percentage points. Moderate variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
150
Countries
10
Collection Start
Jun 9, 2026
Collection End
Jul 25, 2026
Months Recorded
2
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
150
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
150
valid response records.
Approximately
0
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale. Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/codependency-test/statistics/