Ψ Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool
🏠 Main Page 📝 Questionnaire
Research Dataset

Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
DEVELOPING N=133 α=0.96 4Countries

Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale normative dataset currently contains 133 participant records collected between Jun 9, 2026 and Jul 1, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 133 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 29.6 with a standard deviation of 27.27, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.96). Observed skewness (0.43) and kurtosis (-0.62) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

133
Participants
4
Countries
24
Items
0.96
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale
Research Status Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity 55 /100 — DEVELOPING
Participants 133
Countries Represented 4
Items 24
Dimensions 4
Data Collection Period Jun 9, 2026 – Jul 1, 2026
Reliability α = 0.96
Note. The current Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale dataset contains 133 participant records collected from 4 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.

Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 29.6%
Median Score 38
Standard Deviation 27.27
Variance 743.82
Standard Error 2.36
95% CI Lower 24.97
95% CI Upper 34.24
Minimum Score 0%
Maximum Score 100%
Observed Range 100
Note. M = 29.6, SD = 27.27, Median = 38. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 24.97 to 34.24.

Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 133
Countries 4
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.

Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 4 countries. The largest contribution originated from IN (66.9% of available geographic records).

Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 0% Very Low
25th 0% Below Average
50th 38% Average
75th 49% Above Average
90th 61% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale sample.

Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 0% to 100% (M = 29.6, SD = 27.27). Distribution characteristics included skewness (0.43) and kurtosis (-0.62). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.

Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.96
Reliability Classification Excellent
Participants 133
Items 24
Standard Error 2.36
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.

Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q20 0.81 Excellent Q4 0.8 Excellent Q13 0.79 Excellent Q14 0.79 Excellent Q3 0.79 Excellent Q9 0.78 Excellent Q22 0.78 Excellent Q16 0.78 Excellent Q19 0.77 Excellent Q10 0.75 Excellent Q15 0.73 Excellent Q8 0.72 Excellent Q7 0.68 Excellent Q17 0.68 Excellent Q12 0.68 Excellent Q2 0.68 Excellent Q18 0.68 Excellent Q23 0.68 Excellent Q5 0.67 Excellent Q21 0.64 Excellent Q11 0.64 Excellent Q6 0.6 Excellent Q24 0.55 Excellent Q1 0.54 Excellent
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. All items demonstrated acceptable or stronger discrimination. No item-level psychometric concerns were identified within the current dataset.


Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Self-Sacrifice 27.66% 27.13 114
Relationship Enmeshment 24.73% 25.8 114
Approval Dependence 23.93% 25.58 114
Boundary Difficulties 22.54% 24.38 114
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale.

Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Self-Sacrifice (27.7%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Boundary Difficulties (22.5%). The observed difference between dimensions was 5.1 percentage points. Moderate variation was observed between dimensions.

Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 133
Countries 4
Collection Start Jun 9, 2026
Collection End Jul 1, 2026
Months Recorded 2
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 133 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 114 valid response records. Approximately 19 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.


Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.


Recommended Citation

Deenz Multidimensional Codependency Scale. Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/codependency-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset