Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Anthropophobia Test

Research Dataset

Anthropophobia Severity Assessment (AnSA)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
STRONG N=114 α=0.873 32Countries
Abstract

Anthropophobia Severity Assessment (AnSA) normative dataset currently contains 114 participant records collected between Jun 28, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 114 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 54.79 with a standard deviation of 18.02, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.873). Observed skewness (-0.49) and kurtosis (-0.56) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

114
Participants
32
Countries
24
Scale Items
0.873
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Anthropophobia Severity Assessment (AnSA)
Research Status Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity 65 /100 — STRONG
Participants 114
Countries Represented 32
Items 24
Dimensions 7
Data Collection Period Jun 28, 2026 – Oct 28, 2026
Reliability α = 0.873
Note. The current Anthropophobia Severity Assessment (AnSA) dataset contains 114 participant records collected from 32 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 54.79%
Median Score 58.5
Standard Deviation 18.02
Variance 324.75
Standard Error 1.69
95% CI Lower 51.48
95% CI Upper 58.1
Minimum Score 12%
Maximum Score 93%
Observed Range 81
Note. M = 54.79, SD = 18.02, Median = 58.5. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 51.48 to 58.1.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 114
Countries 32
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 32 countries. The largest contribution originated from US (38.6% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 27% Very Low
25th 45% Below Average
50th 58% Average
75th 70% Above Average
90th 75% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Anthropophobia Severity Assessment (AnSA) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 12% to 93% (M = 54.79, SD = 18.02). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.49) and kurtosis (-0.56). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.873
Reliability Classification Good
Participants 114
Items 24
Standard Error 1.69
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q54 0.82 Excellent Q50 0.82 Excellent Q58 0.81 Excellent Q53 0.81 Excellent Q49 0.81 Excellent Q51 0.8 Excellent Q55 0.79 Excellent Q59 0.79 Excellent Q57 0.73 Excellent Q56 0.46 Acceptable Q60 0.42 Acceptable Q43 0.39 Acceptable Q45 0.38 Acceptable Q39 0.33 Acceptable Q47 0.31 Acceptable Q46 0.31 Acceptable Q37 0.29 Weak Q41 0.28 Weak Q42 0.27 Weak Q52 0.26 Weak Q38 0.17 Problematic Q44 0.05 Problematic Q48 -0.08 Problematic Q40 -0.14 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified8 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q37 (r = 0.29)
    I become anxious when I have to interact with unfamiliar people.
  • Q38 (r = 0.17)
    Being around people makes me feel uncomfortable.
  • Q40 (r = -0.14)
    I remain emotionally comfortable when interacting with people.
  • Q41 (r = 0.28)
    I expect people to judge me negatively.
  • Q42 (r = 0.27)
    I believe others notice my mistakes.
  • Q44 (r = 0.05)
    I believe most people are accepting and understanding.
  • Q48 (r = -0.08)
    I remain physically relaxed when interacting with others.
  • Q52 (r = 0.26)
    I willingly participate in social situations.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q40 ("I remain emotionally comfortable when interacting with people."; r = -0.14), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Emotional Reactions 75.25% 18.65 114
Fear Cognitions 73.58% 21.31 114
Physical Reactions 71.07% 21.56 113
Social Triggers 57.03% 28.37 114
Avoidance Behavior 32.04% 19.1 113
Functional Impact 31.13% 16.75 113
Safety Behaviors 30.99% 16.04 113
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Anthropophobia Severity Assessment (AnSA).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Emotional Reactions (75.3%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Safety Behaviors (31%). The observed difference between dimensions was 44.3 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 114
Countries 32
Collection Start Jun 28, 2026
Collection End Oct 28, 2026
Months Recorded 5
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 114 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 114 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Anthropophobia Severity Assessment (AnSA). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/anthropophobia-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset