Deenz Anger Response Scale (DARS)
normative dataset currently contains
161
participant records collected between
Jun 12, 2026
and
Oct 7, 2026
.
This psychometric dataset currently includes 161 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 53.52 with a standard deviation of 20.34, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.925). Observed skewness (-0.16) and kurtosis (-0.75) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.
161
Participants
37
Countries
24
Scale Items
0.925
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment
Deenz Anger Response Scale (DARS)
Research Status
Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity
70
/100 —
STRONG
Participants
161
Countries Represented
37
Items
24
Dimensions
7
Data Collection Period
Jun 12, 2026
–
Oct 7, 2026
Reliability
α =
0.925
Note.
The current Deenz Anger Response Scale (DARS) dataset contains 161 participant records collected from 37 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic
Value
Mean Score
53.52%
Median Score
53
Standard Deviation
20.34
Variance
413.9
Standard Error
1.6
95% CI Lower
50.38
95% CI Upper
56.66
Minimum Score
9%
Maximum Score
96%
Observed Range
87
Note.
M = 53.52, SD = 20.34, Median = 53. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 50.38 to 56.66.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable
Summary
Participants
N =
161
Countries
37
Age Information
Available
Gender Information
Available
Note.
Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Age Distribution
Age Group
Participants
under18
42
18-24
25
25-34
18
prefer_not
13
35-44
9
55plus
7
45-54
2
Gender Distribution
Gender
Participants
Female
61
Male
43
Prefer_not
12
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note.
Participants were represented across 37 countries. The largest contribution originated from DE (14.9% of available geographic records).
Country
Participants
Percent
DE
24
14.9%
US
22
13.7%
FR
14
8.7%
MX
14
8.7%
IN
11
6.8%
AR
10
6.2%
CO
9
5.6%
ES
9
5.6%
BR
7
4.3%
NL
5
3.1%
UA
4
2.5%
GB
3
1.9%
CA
3
1.9%
BE
2
1.2%
RU
2
1.2%
BO
1
0.6%
NO
1
0.6%
PE
1
0.6%
EE
1
0.6%
CL
1
0.6%
EC
1
0.6%
DO
1
0.6%
GT
1
0.6%
SE
1
0.6%
PY
1
0.6%
PT
1
0.6%
SG
1
0.6%
VE
1
0.6%
RE
1
0.6%
AT
1
0.6%
NZ
1
0.6%
JP
1
0.6%
AU
1
0.6%
CH
1
0.6%
MY
1
0.6%
JO
1
0.6%
KW
1
0.6%
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile
Score
Interpretation
10th
27%
Very Low
25th
38%
Below Average
50th
53%
Average
75th
71%
Above Average
90th
80%
Elevated
Note.
Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Anger Response Scale (DARS) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note.
Observed scores ranged from 9% to 96% (M = 53.52, SD = 20.34). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.16) and kurtosis (-0.75).
Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric
Value
Cronbach Alpha
0.925
Reliability Classification
Excellent
Participants
161
Items
24
Standard Error
1.6
Note.
Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Analysis Interpretation
Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct.
The analysis identified1
itemthat may benefit from future review.
Items Recommended for Future Review
Q24
(r = -0.05)
I make fun of or tease others when I'm angry.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q24 ("I make fun of or tease others when I'm angry."; r = -0.05), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension
Mean
SD
N
Escalation
59.4%
27.68
161
Defensiveness
59.36%
25.59
161
Passive-Aggression
58.88%
25.17
161
Impatience
55.97%
26.35
161
Blame
53.89%
22.37
161
Revenge
51.43%
29.91
161
Intimidation
41.03%
23.4
161
Note.
Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Anger Response Scale (DARS).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note.
The highest observed dimension was Escalation (59.4%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Intimidation (41%). The observed difference between dimensions was 18.4 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric
Value
Current Participants
161
Countries
37
Collection Start
Jun 12, 2026
Collection End
Oct 7, 2026
Months Recorded
5
Note.
Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice
A total of
161
participant responses were available for this assessment.
Dimension-level norms were calculated using
161
valid response records.
Approximately
0
response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.
Limitations
Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.
Ethical Statement
All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.
Recommended Citation
Deenz Anger Response Scale (DARS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/anger-test/statistics/