Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Anger Issues Test - Do I have Anger Issues Quiz

Research Dataset

Deenz Anger Response Scale (DARS)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
STRONG N=185 α=0.931 40Countries
Abstract

Deenz Anger Response Scale (DARS) normative dataset currently contains 185 participant records collected between Jun 12, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 185 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 54.88 with a standard deviation of 21.01, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.931). Observed skewness (-0.16) and kurtosis (-0.83) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

185
Participants
40
Countries
24
Scale Items
0.931
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Anger Response Scale (DARS)
Research Status Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity 70 /100 — STRONG
Participants 185
Countries Represented 40
Items 24
Dimensions 7
Data Collection Period Jun 12, 2026 – Oct 27, 2026
Reliability α = 0.931
Note. The current Deenz Anger Response Scale (DARS) dataset contains 185 participant records collected from 40 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 54.88%
Median Score 54
Standard Deviation 21.01
Variance 441.27
Standard Error 1.54
95% CI Lower 51.85
95% CI Upper 57.9
Minimum Score 9%
Maximum Score 96%
Observed Range 87
Note. M = 54.88, SD = 21.01, Median = 54. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 51.85 to 57.9.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 185
Countries 40
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 40 countries. The largest contribution originated from DE (14.6% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 27% Very Low
25th 39% Below Average
50th 54% Average
75th 72% Above Average
90th 84% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Anger Response Scale (DARS) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 9% to 96% (M = 54.88, SD = 21.01). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.16) and kurtosis (-0.83). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.931
Reliability Classification Excellent
Participants 185
Items 24
Standard Error 1.54
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q14 0.73 Excellent Q18 0.7 Excellent Q13 0.7 Excellent Q2 0.68 Excellent Q8 0.68 Excellent Q19 0.67 Excellent Q7 0.67 Excellent Q5 0.66 Excellent Q23 0.65 Excellent Q15 0.63 Excellent Q3 0.62 Excellent Q17 0.61 Excellent Q6 0.6 Excellent Q21 0.6 Excellent Q9 0.59 Excellent Q4 0.59 Excellent Q22 0.59 Excellent Q20 0.59 Excellent Q12 0.57 Excellent Q10 0.54 Excellent Q16 0.43 Acceptable Q11 0.36 Acceptable Q1 0.3 Acceptable Q24 -0.06 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified1 itemthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q24 (r = -0.06)
    I make fun of or tease others when I'm angry.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q24 ("I make fun of or tease others when I'm angry."; r = -0.06), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Defensiveness 60.77% 26.23 185
Escalation 60.7% 28.09 185
Passive-Aggression 59.89% 25.97 185
Impatience 57.3% 26.47 185
Blame 55.88% 23.1 185
Revenge 52.79% 30.82 185
Intimidation 42.07% 23.14 185
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Anger Response Scale (DARS).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Defensiveness (60.8%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Intimidation (42.1%). The observed difference between dimensions was 18.7 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 185
Countries 40
Collection Start Jun 12, 2026
Collection End Oct 27, 2026
Months Recorded 5
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 185 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 185 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Deenz Anger Response Scale (DARS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/anger-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset

PDF