Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Sexual Addiction Screening Test (SAST)

Research Dataset

Sexual Addiction Screening Test (SAST)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
PRELIMINARY N=16 α=0 11Countries
Abstract

Sexual Addiction Screening Test (SAST) normative dataset currently contains 16 participant records collected between Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 21, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 16 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 41.63 with a standard deviation of 17.37, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis produced a Cronbach alpha of 0, which falls below commonly accepted psychometric standards and should be interpreted cautiously until additional data are collected. Observed skewness (-0.62) and kurtosis (1.31) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

16
Participants
11
Countries
45
Scale Items
0
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Sexual Addiction Screening Test (SAST)
Research Status Preliminary Dataset
Dataset Maturity 15 /100 — PRELIMINARY
Participants 16
Countries Represented 11
Items 45
Dimensions 16
Data Collection Period Jul 3, 2026 – Aug 21, 2026
Reliability α = 0
Note. The current Sexual Addiction Screening Test (SAST) dataset contains 16 participant records collected from 11 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 41.63%
Median Score 42
Standard Deviation 17.37
Variance 301.85
Standard Error 4.34
95% CI Lower 33.11
95% CI Upper 50.14
Minimum Score 0%
Maximum Score 73%
Observed Range 73
Note. M = 41.63, SD = 17.37, Median = 42. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 33.11 to 50.14.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 16
Countries 11
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 11 countries. The largest contribution originated from US (18.8% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 18% Very Low
25th 31% Below Average
50th 42% Average
75th 51% Above Average
90th 58% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Sexual Addiction Screening Test (SAST) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 0% to 73% (M = 41.63, SD = 17.37). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.62) and kurtosis (1.31). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0
Reliability Classification Unacceptable
Participants 16
Items 45
Standard Error 4.34
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Insufficient Sample Size

Item–total correlations are not currently reported because the assessment has fewer than 100 participant responses. Psychometric item analysis requires a larger sample to produce stable and interpretable estimates.

Current Participants: 16
Minimum Recommended: 100
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Emotional Coping 87.5% 34.16 16
Secrecy 81.25% 40.31 16
Sexual Preoccupation 59.38% 37.5 16
Emotional Distress 58.75% 30.52 16
Loss of Control 58.5% 22.93 16
Pornography Use 53.13% 27.2 16
Functional Impairment 50% 51.64 16
Online Sexual Behavior 47.88% 23.47 16
Developmental Factors 43.75% 40.31 16
Compulsive Sexual Tendencies 40% 28.28 16
Sexual Behavior Patterns 31.25% 47.87 16
Relationship Impact 20.75% 23.98 16
Risky Sexual Behavior 19.88% 28.04 16
Relationship Difficulties 18.75% 40.31 16
Behavioral Dysregulation 12.5% 34.16 16
Illegal/Risky Sexual Behavior 9.38% 27.2 16
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Sexual Addiction Screening Test (SAST).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Emotional Coping (87.5%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Illegal/Risky Sexual Behavior (9.4%). The observed difference between dimensions was 78.1 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 16
Countries 11
Collection Start Jul 3, 2026
Collection End Aug 21, 2026
Months Recorded 2
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 16 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 16 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Sexual Addiction Screening Test (SAST). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/sexual-addiction-screening-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset