Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Sadism Test - Am I Sadistic?

Research Dataset

Deenz Sadism Tendency Assessment Scale (DTAS-24)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
ROBUST N=4044 α=0.738 130Countries
Abstract

Deenz Sadism Tendency Assessment Scale (DTAS-24) normative dataset currently contains 4044 participant records collected between Jun 5, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 4044 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 59.53 with a standard deviation of 16.61, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.738). Observed skewness (-0.18) and kurtosis (0.12) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

4044
Participants
130
Countries
24
Scale Items
0.738
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Deenz Sadism Tendency Assessment Scale (DTAS-24)
Research Status Robust Dataset
Dataset Maturity 90 /100 — ROBUST
Participants 4044
Countries Represented 130
Items 24
Dimensions 4
Data Collection Period Jun 5, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026
Reliability α = 0.738
Note. The current Deenz Sadism Tendency Assessment Scale (DTAS-24) dataset contains 4044 participant records collected from 130 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 59.53%
Median Score 59
Standard Deviation 16.61
Variance 275.74
Standard Error 0.26
95% CI Lower 59.02
95% CI Upper 60.04
Minimum Score 0%
Maximum Score 100%
Observed Range 100
Note. M = 59.53, SD = 16.61, Median = 59. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 59.02 to 60.04.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 4044
Countries 130
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 130 countries. The largest contribution originated from US (20.4% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 40% Very Low
25th 49% Below Average
50th 59% Average
75th 71% Above Average
90th 81% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Deenz Sadism Tendency Assessment Scale (DTAS-24) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 0% to 100% (M = 59.53, SD = 16.61). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-0.18) and kurtosis (0.12). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0.738
Reliability Classification Acceptable
Participants 4044
Items 24
Standard Error 0.26
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q18 0.39 Acceptable Q24 0.39 Acceptable Q17 0.37 Acceptable Q22 0.37 Acceptable Q23 0.37 Acceptable Q16 0.37 Acceptable Q4 0.33 Acceptable Q12 0.33 Acceptable Q10 0.33 Acceptable Q5 0.32 Acceptable Q6 0.29 Weak Q20 0.26 Weak Q21 0.26 Weak Q3 0.26 Weak Q2 0.25 Weak Q9 0.24 Weak Q1 0.24 Weak Q8 0.23 Weak Q19 0.23 Weak Q11 0.22 Weak Q7 0.22 Weak Q14 0.17 Problematic Q13 0.12 Problematic Q15 0.11 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified14 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q1 (r = 0.24)
    I may enjoy intimidating others.
  • Q2 (r = 0.25)
    I can feel a need to put people in their place.
  • Q3 (r = 0.26)
    I sometimes enjoy having power over others.
  • Q6 (r = 0.29)
    I usually avoid dominating others.
  • Q7 (r = 0.22)
    I may use people to get what I want.
  • Q8 (r = 0.23)
    I can hide my intentions when it benefits me.
  • Q9 (r = 0.24)
    I sometimes influence others for personal gain.
  • Q11 (r = 0.22)
    I usually say what I truly mean.
  • Q13 (r = 0.12)
    Others' suffering may not affect me much.
  • Q14 (r = 0.17)
    I can be insensitive to other people's pain.
  • Q15 (r = 0.11)
    I may feel little guilt after hurting someone.
  • Q19 (r = 0.23)
    I may enjoy seeing people embarrassed.
  • Q20 (r = 0.26)
    Others' frustration can be amusing to me.
  • Q21 (r = 0.26)
    I sometimes provoke people for amusement.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q15 ("I may feel little guilt after hurting someone."; r = 0.11), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Sadism 66.91% 20.25 4044
Aggression 59.07% 18.72 4044
Manipulation 56.89% 19.24 4044
Cruelty 55.47% 20.55 4044
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Deenz Sadism Tendency Assessment Scale (DTAS-24).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Sadism (66.9%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Cruelty (55.5%). The observed difference between dimensions was 11.4 percentage points. Moderate variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 4044
Countries 130
Collection Start Jun 5, 2026
Collection End Nov 3, 2026
Months Recorded 6
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 4044 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 4044 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Deenz Sadism Tendency Assessment Scale (DTAS-24). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/sadism-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset

PDF