Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Sociopath Test - Antisocial Preferences Scale (APS-35)

Research Dataset

Antisocial Preferences Scale (APS-35)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
PRELIMINARY N=2 α=0 2Countries
Abstract

Antisocial Preferences Scale (APS-35) normative dataset currently contains 2 participant records collected between Jul 4, 2026 and Jul 5, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 2 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 55 with a standard deviation of 26.87, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis produced a Cronbach alpha of 0, which falls below commonly accepted psychometric standards and should be interpreted cautiously until additional data are collected. Observed skewness (0) and kurtosis (0) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

2
Participants
2
Countries
35
Scale Items
0
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Antisocial Preferences Scale (APS-35)
Research Status Preliminary Dataset
Dataset Maturity 5 /100 — PRELIMINARY
Participants 2
Countries Represented 2
Items 35
Dimensions 7
Data Collection Period Jul 4, 2026 – Jul 5, 2026
Reliability α = 0
Note. The current Antisocial Preferences Scale (APS-35) dataset contains 2 participant records collected from 2 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 55%
Median Score 55
Standard Deviation 26.87
Variance 722
Standard Error 19
95% CI Lower 17.76
95% CI Upper 92.24
Minimum Score 36%
Maximum Score 74%
Observed Range 38
Note. M = 55, SD = 26.87, Median = 55. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 17.76 to 92.24.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 2
Countries 2
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 2 countries. The largest contribution originated from IN (50% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 36% Very Low
25th 36% Below Average
50th 36% Average
75th 36% Above Average
90th 36% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Antisocial Preferences Scale (APS-35) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 36% to 74% (M = 55, SD = 26.87). Distribution characteristics included skewness (0) and kurtosis (0). Distribution indices suggested no substantial departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0
Reliability Classification Unacceptable
Participants 2
Items 35
Standard Error 19
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Insufficient Sample Size

Item–total correlations are not currently reported because the assessment has fewer than 100 participant responses. Psychometric item analysis requires a larger sample to produce stable and interpretable estimates.

Current Participants: 2
Minimum Recommended: 100
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Impulsiveness 75% 0 2
Risk-Taking 63% 35.36 2
Breaking Legal Norms 62.5% 31.82 2
Lack of Guilt or Remorse 57.5% 24.75 2
Aggressiveness 55% 12.73 2
Incapacity for Mutually Intimate Relationships 40% 56.57 2
Egocentrism 35% 28.28 2
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Antisocial Preferences Scale (APS-35).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Impulsiveness (75%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Egocentrism (35%). The observed difference between dimensions was 40 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 2
Countries 2
Collection Start Jul 4, 2026
Collection End Jul 5, 2026
Months Recorded 1
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 2 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 2 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Antisocial Preferences Scale (APS-35). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/antisocial-preferences-scale/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset