Drdeenz_ The Psychometric Tool

Ambivert Continuum Test

Research Dataset

Ambivert Personality Continuum Scale (APCS)

Normative and Psychometric Statistics
PRELIMINARY N=115 α=0 12Countries
Abstract

Ambivert Personality Continuum Scale (APCS) normative dataset currently contains 115 participant records collected between Jun 22, 2026 and Oct 31, 2026 .

This psychometric dataset currently includes 115 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 48.9 with a standard deviation of 9.34, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis produced a Cronbach alpha of 0, which falls below commonly accepted psychometric standards and should be interpreted cautiously until additional data are collected. Observed skewness (-1.19) and kurtosis (2.58) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The distribution demonstrated mild departures from normality, although the overall score pattern remained broadly interpretable for preliminary normative purposes.

115
Participants
12
Countries
96
Scale Items
0
Reliability
Table 1
Dataset Overview
Assessment Ambivert Personality Continuum Scale (APCS)
Research Status Established Dataset
Dataset Maturity 35 /100 — PRELIMINARY
Participants 115
Countries Represented 12
Items 96
Dimensions 24
Data Collection Period Jun 22, 2026 – Oct 31, 2026
Reliability α = 0
Note. The current Ambivert Personality Continuum Scale (APCS) dataset contains 115 participant records collected from 12 countries. Dataset maturity reflects sample size, geographic diversity, and internal consistency reliability.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Statistic Value
Mean Score 48.9%
Median Score 53
Standard Deviation 9.34
Variance 87.18
Standard Error 0.87
95% CI Lower 47.19
95% CI Upper 50.6
Minimum Score 13%
Maximum Score 66%
Observed Range 53
Note. M = 48.9, SD = 9.34, Median = 53. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 47.19 to 50.6.
Table 3
Sample Characteristics
Variable Summary
Participants N = 115
Countries 12
Age Information Available
Gender Information Available
Note. Demographic information was collected voluntarily. Participant counts may vary across demographic categories when information was not reported.
Figure 1
Global Participation
Note. Participants were represented across 12 countries. The largest contribution originated from IN (82.6% of available geographic records).
Table 4
Percentile Norms
Percentile Score Interpretation
10th 38% Very Low
25th 44% Below Average
50th 53% Average
75th 55% Above Average
90th 55% Elevated
Note. Percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks derived from the current Ambivert Personality Continuum Scale (APCS) sample.
Figure 2
Score Distribution
Note. Observed scores ranged from 13% to 66% (M = 48.9, SD = 9.34). Distribution characteristics included skewness (-1.19) and kurtosis (2.58). Distribution indices suggested mild departures from normality.
Table 5
Reliability Analysis
Metric Value
Cronbach Alpha 0
Reliability Classification Unacceptable
Participants 115
Items 96
Standard Error 0.87
Note. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha. Reliability estimates are based on the current normative dataset and may change as additional responses are collected.
Item–Total Correlations
Item Item Quality r Rating Q58 0.72 Excellent Q76 0.72 Excellent Q77 0.71 Excellent Q11 0.71 Excellent Q12 0.71 Excellent Q16 0.71 Excellent Q57 0.69 Excellent Q73 0.68 Excellent Q3 0.68 Excellent Q74 0.68 Excellent Q78 0.68 Excellent Q14 0.66 Excellent Q75 0.65 Excellent Q13 0.65 Excellent Q56 0.65 Excellent Q79 0.65 Excellent Q55 0.63 Excellent Q68 0.62 Excellent Q59 0.6 Excellent Q10 0.59 Excellent Q29 0.59 Excellent Q15 0.58 Excellent Q69 0.58 Excellent Q9 0.58 Excellent Q30 0.57 Excellent Q26 0.56 Excellent Q60 0.56 Excellent Q17 0.54 Excellent Q51 0.54 Excellent Q2 0.54 Excellent Q32 0.54 Excellent Q28 0.52 Excellent Q61 0.52 Excellent Q52 0.52 Excellent Q19 0.51 Excellent Q33 0.51 Excellent Q53 0.5 Excellent Q27 0.5 Acceptable Q8 0.49 Acceptable Q31 0.49 Acceptable Q82 0.49 Acceptable Q81 0.49 Acceptable Q18 0.49 Acceptable Q50 0.48 Acceptable Q54 0.48 Acceptable Q80 0.48 Acceptable Q90 0.47 Acceptable Q72 0.47 Acceptable Q34 0.47 Acceptable Q83 0.46 Acceptable Q49 0.46 Acceptable Q23 0.45 Acceptable Q91 0.44 Acceptable Q35 0.44 Acceptable Q89 0.44 Acceptable Q67 0.44 Acceptable Q25 0.43 Acceptable Q45 0.43 Acceptable Q22 0.41 Acceptable Q1 0.41 Acceptable Q71 0.4 Acceptable Q62 0.4 Acceptable Q24 0.4 Acceptable Q47 0.39 Acceptable Q70 0.39 Acceptable Q46 0.37 Acceptable Q44 0.37 Acceptable Q64 0.36 Acceptable Q66 0.35 Acceptable Q41 0.34 Acceptable Q87 0.34 Acceptable Q63 0.33 Acceptable Q65 0.33 Acceptable Q48 0.32 Acceptable Q43 0.31 Acceptable Q92 0.3 Acceptable Q88 0.29 Weak Q96 0.27 Weak Q42 0.26 Weak Q84 0.24 Weak Q20 0.22 Weak Q21 0.22 Weak Q86 0.22 Weak Q94 0.21 Weak Q36 0.19 Problematic Q93 0.18 Problematic Q95 0.17 Problematic Q85 0.16 Problematic Q6 0.12 Problematic Q4 0.11 Problematic Q7 0.09 Problematic Q5 0.06 Problematic Q40 0.04 Problematic Q38 0.02 Problematic Q39 -0.05 Problematic Q37 -0.08 Problematic
Item Analysis Interpretation

Item–total correlations were generally strong across the assessment, indicating that most items contribute effectively to the measurement of the underlying construct. The analysis identified20 itemsthat may benefit from future review.

Items Recommended for Future Review
  • Q4 (r = 0.11)
    I question ideas.
  • Q5 (r = 0.06)
    I enjoy analysis.
  • Q6 (r = 0.12)
    I seek understanding.
  • Q7 (r = 0.09)
    I notice patterns.
  • Q20 (r = 0.22)
    I remember details.
  • Q21 (r = 0.22)
    I feel responsible.
  • Q36 (r = 0.19)
    I get inspired.
  • Q37 (r = -0.08)
    I like structure.
  • Q38 (r = 0.02)
    I organize tasks.
  • Q39 (r = -0.05)
    I expect results.
  • Q40 (r = 0.04)
    I enjoy action.
  • Q42 (r = 0.26)
    I act quickly.
  • Q84 (r = 0.24)
    I enjoy different social settings.
  • Q85 (r = 0.16)
    I balance people and personal time.
  • Q86 (r = 0.22)
    I avoid extremes.
  • Q88 (r = 0.29)
    I know when to step back.
  • Q93 (r = 0.18)
    I can be outgoing when needed.
  • Q94 (r = 0.21)
    I change my style when needed.
  • Q95 (r = 0.17)
    I switch roles comfortably.
  • Q96 (r = 0.27)
    I adapt socially when needed.
The lowest item–total correlation was observed for Q37 ("I like structure."; r = -0.08), indicating comparatively weaker alignment with the overall construct.
Table 7
Dimension Norms
Dimension Mean SD N
Reflective Processing 65.05% 21.36 110
ISTP 63.02% 24.51 110
ENFJ 62.85% 30 110
Social Energy 61.6% 30.01 110
ISFJ 60.34% 25.1 110
ENTJ 58.65% 30.8 110
ENTP 58.01% 32.42 110
ISTJ 56.54% 24.15 110
INTP 56.45% 25.86 115
ENFP 55.12% 16.53 110
ESTJ 53.59% 25.5 110
Context Flexibility 53.26% 32.03 110
INFJ 52.13% 19.41 115
ISFP 51% 19.83 110
ESFP 50.93% 21.5 110
ESFJ 49.79% 18.83 110
INFP 49.41% 25.92 114
Social Switching 48.76% 31.19 110
Solitude Preference 41.18% 24.16 110
Social Initiative 39.39% 24.75 110
ESTP 34.4% 30.48 110
Behavioral Balance 33.45% 29.36 110
INTJ 29.73% 28.51 115
Adaptability 27.16% 23.74 110
Note. Dimension statistics summarize normative performance across the major constructs measured by Ambivert Personality Continuum Scale (APCS).
Figure 5
Dimension Profile
Note. The highest observed dimension was Reflective Processing (65.1%), whereas the lowest observed dimension was Adaptability (27.2%). The observed difference between dimensions was 37.9 percentage points. Substantial variation was observed between dimensions.
Table 8
Dataset Growth Summary
Metric Value
Current Participants 115
Countries 12
Collection Start Jun 22, 2026
Collection End Oct 31, 2026
Months Recorded 5
Note. Growth statistics summarize cumulative participation throughout the observed data collection period.
Normative Data Notice

A total of 115 participant responses were available for this assessment. Dimension-level norms were calculated using 115 valid response records. Approximately 0 response record(s) were excluded from dimension-level normative calculations due to incomplete response patterns.

Limitations

Normative statistics are derived from voluntary participation and may not represent all populations. Reliability estimates, percentile norms, and dimension statistics should be interpreted in the context of the current sample and may change as additional responses are collected.

Ethical Statement

All records included in this dataset were collected anonymously. No personally identifying information is stored. Data are intended for educational, psychometric, and research purposes.

Recommended Citation

Ambivert Personality Continuum Scale (APCS). Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://drdeenz.com/ambivert-test/statistics/

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset